ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Want to actually use your .NAME? Wait two to four weeks... | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 23 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Want to actually use your .NAME? Wait two to
    by JohnR (yes@fakemail.com) on Friday February 08 2002, @08:41AM (#4839)
    User #2937 Info
    i said it before, but I am saying it again.
    It just doesn't make sense to use .name.

    What name? product name? service name? Movie name? book name? geographic name? government name? country name? nick name? school name? church name? lawyer name? personal name? It just does not make any sense. If an individual uses johnsmith.web, that might make some sense. Or at least use a TLD like .ind(ividual).

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Want to actually use your .NAME? Wait two to
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Wednesday February 13 2002, @11:51AM (#4873)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    Well, as of today, the name server changes to dan.tobias.name are finally in effect.

    Now, I can only hope that, in another two weeks, it won't revert to incorrect nameserver settings due to an out-of-sync attempt to process later attempted changes (early on, after the first attempt to change the nameservers seemed to go nowhere, I tried the approach of changing them back to the registrar's defaults and then back again to mine; that's the method that actually worked at one point to clear up a glitch in making server changes for .info or .biz). That could mean that there are further nameserver changes still "in the queue" that, if processed in the wrong order or only partially could result in the nameservers getting set incorrectly, a situation that would take another two to four weeks to correct. Gee, I hate dealing with domains that lack real-time modification ability. It reminds me of dealing with computers in the ancient days when you had to give them your data in stacks of punch cards and then wait for the computer priesthood to get around to running it...
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: GNR Contact Numbers
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday June 07 2002, @09:09PM (#6991)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    They are there - click on 'about GNR' then go to the press release sections.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re: .NAME will flop... here's why:
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Friday February 08 2002, @05:35AM (#4836)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    .name does serve a useful purpose; none of the other TLDs are intended for personal sites. If you're commercial, or an organization, or a government, or a military, the old TLDs had a place for you, but not if you were a person. While it's true that most non-geek people haven't yet seen the need to own a domain name at all, a growing number will probably ultimately come to the realization that it's foolish to let your email or web address be at the mercy of your ISP; there have been several recent cases of thousands of people being forced to change their email address because the corporate marketing types at their ISP decided to change its name and move everybody to a different domain. Also, there are lots of people, especially on AOL, who regret the "lock-in effect" caused by them using the email address on their first provider so heavily that they don't want to have to change it even though they hate the provider and really want to switch. Thus, there's a very large potential market for personal domains.

    As for the multiple John Smiths, it's first come first served, just like other TLDs. The registry suggests appending numbers to either the first or the last name for subsequent applicants. If you find that awkward, you'll have to use your creativity to come up with a nickname that isn't yet taken, just like finding a name in any other TLD.

    The registries and registrars for the new TLDs have screwed up a lot of things, but that doesn't mean that the concept of these new TLDs is bad in itself.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Want to actually use your .NAME? Wait two to
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Monday February 11 2002, @07:49AM (#4855)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    It wasn't, as far as I am aware, laid out anyhwere that there would be a two week period between processing of requests to change nameservers (or contact info, etc.) for an already-registered domain.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com