ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Want to actually use your .NAME? Wait two to four weeks... | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 23 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Want to actually use your .NAME? Wait two to
    by Anonymous on Thursday February 07 2002, @07:14PM (#4832)
    .Web domains work. Now. If ICANN were to give IOD the nod, nothing would have to be done to get them working.

    The only concept being proven here is that if you choose based on politics you get garbage.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    .NAME will flop... here's why:
    by Anonymous on Friday February 08 2002, @04:22AM (#4835)
    In order for a 'product' to succeed in a market it has to be useful and serve a purpose. This guy dtobias is the only person I know of who actually bought a .NAME address. The public doesn't want or need .NAME TLDs. The company is big on hype and small on usefulness. I also still haven't found a decent explanation on what happens when 50 people who all have the same name apply. Does the first one to apply get the name? How many "John M. Smith's" exist in the world? I think the whole .NAME TLD is stupid. Do you know of anyone who bought names?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Want to actually use your .NAME? Wait two to
    by JohnR (yes@fakemail.com) on Friday February 08 2002, @08:41AM (#4839)
    User #2937 Info
    i said it before, but I am saying it again.
    It just doesn't make sense to use .name.

    What name? product name? service name? Movie name? book name? geographic name? government name? country name? nick name? school name? church name? lawyer name? personal name? It just does not make any sense. If an individual uses johnsmith.web, that might make some sense. Or at least use a TLD like .ind(ividual).

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Personal TLDs can be popular
    by Anonymous on Saturday February 09 2002, @03:00AM (#4842)
    Take a look at .me.uk added recently for personal domain names. It seems to be doing well, and it is basically the exact same idea as .name.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: .name is going to be handling a lot of incomin
    by Anonymous on Saturday February 09 2002, @10:32PM (#4843)
    Spammers will target .name because it will be easy to guess valid email addresses.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Want to actually use your .NAME? Wait two to
    by Anonymous on Sunday February 10 2002, @07:58PM (#4845)
    I want: John.JakobJingleHeimerSchmidt.name
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Want to actually use your .NAME? Wait two to
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Wednesday February 13 2002, @11:51AM (#4873)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    Well, as of today, the name server changes to dan.tobias.name are finally in effect.

    Now, I can only hope that, in another two weeks, it won't revert to incorrect nameserver settings due to an out-of-sync attempt to process later attempted changes (early on, after the first attempt to change the nameservers seemed to go nowhere, I tried the approach of changing them back to the registrar's defaults and then back again to mine; that's the method that actually worked at one point to clear up a glitch in making server changes for .info or .biz). That could mean that there are further nameserver changes still "in the queue" that, if processed in the wrong order or only partially could result in the nameservers getting set incorrectly, a situation that would take another two to four weeks to correct. Gee, I hate dealing with domains that lack real-time modification ability. It reminds me of dealing with computers in the ancient days when you had to give them your data in stacks of punch cards and then wait for the computer priesthood to get around to running it...
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: GNR Contact Numbers
    by ANNODOMINI2000 (reversethis-{KU.OC.OOHAY} {ta} {D0002DA}) on Friday June 07 2002, @09:09PM (#6991)
    User #3359 Info | http://www.ad2000d.co.uk/
    They are there - click on 'about GNR' then go to the press release sections.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com