| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
There Was an 'Option C' - Are You Surprised?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 5 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
|
Correct. The PUBLIC message was "A" or "B". But the message floating around the registrar constituency, (apparently passed on by someone at ICANN and/or Verisign to registrars in attendance at Melbourne was) "this thing is going to fly, give us a short list and we may consider some changes." Many registrars (some who had just been granted the new TLD's and some who are still gunning for new TLD's) were not going to fight ICANN very hard on this whole issue. Understand why? (Unless you want to consider what they did do: "uh, we object, Hmm. By the way, if you must approve please consider these changes.." .)
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
