| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Why Did ICANN Do It?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 24 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
But I also have a question for Michael or other legal minds. Once Karl leaves office, is he not then free (or at least freer) to disclose what he knows? He no longer has any fiduciary responsibility.
He does. Besides, the court order, once formalized and entered (we still have to draft the formal order), including the provision that he must give ICANN 10 days notice before disclosing confidential documents, will be binding on him personally, not just in his capacity as an ICANN Director.
-J, one of Karl's attorneys
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Re: Why Did ICANN Do It?
by jtyre
|
|
|
 |
I didn't realize his fiduciary duty carried past his term. I've been a Director of Canadian non-profits and SFAIK that doesn't obtain up here. At least I hope not. :) On your second point, perhaps this wasn't such a clear win then, if it will ultimately bind him more than if he hadn't filed. Still, excellent work. Congrats. -g
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| - 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|