ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    YANNA, Yet another new.net announcement | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 72 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: Afilias and Neulevel runs a Protection Racket
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Saturday August 11 2001, @04:38PM (#1785)
    User #2810 Info
    Anon writes:
    If you see new.net as a protection racket what in the heavens do you see ICANN's Afilias and Neulevel as? This oughta be good.
    As a matter of fact, and as should be clear from my too numerous other posts, I see them as a protection racket as well. There, I hope that was as good for you as it was for me. :) Unfortunately, like a Monty Python skit, they haven't yet hit on the other other operation. Instead of hitting on the corps that can afford it, they have hit on the speculators that can afford it. The speculators will be broke and/or lose interest before the corps. In a best case scenario both will wind up paying for the names, so perhaps NeuLevel and Afilias aren't as braindead as they appear. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Afilias and Neulevel runs a Protection Racket by fnord
    Re: Afilias and Neulevel runs a Protection Racket
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Saturday August 11 2001, @05:16PM (#1786)
    User #2810 Info
    And, I should have said...of course the IP lobby is to blame. This is the 'I have the protection of a lawyer' part of the protection racket.
    Ohhh, look out Mr. Stringbeansforsalecheap.com, someone has registered stringbeansforsalecheap.net and that will entirely tarnish your image, dilute your brand, and cause you to sell five beans online next year instead of the six that we prognosticate you would otherwise have managed. Give us $10,000 and we'll make it right for you, registering your name across the gTLD/ccTLD/altRoot board, filing a UDRP claim against that .net wannabe, sending out boilerplate letters to any sLD containing the string 'bean' (SOTTO VOCE: no, not the stringbean, the string 'bean', you moron), joining the IP constituency of ICANN and lobbying for the death penalty for anyone attempting a WHOIS lookup which contains the letter 's', and getting you back to those six beans we foretold you might earn in these heady days of dotcommercialism.
    To which the harried realworld businessperson replies:
    Oh dear, I've heard about that internet and all its intendant virus problems and everything. Please mommy, cut a check for this gentleman so that we can sleep soundly in our beds tonight.
    Cynical? Moi? Well anyway, long before the IP interests glommed onto this racket, Network Solutions had this bright idea to undifferentiate the namespace, they were just too busy cashing checks to check whether someone fit in .com or .net or .org or elsewhere. And that leads us to .info having to walk through every single application by hand. Ya, blame the IP folks but they were unfashionably late to the party. It was NSI's way to make a quick buck that munged up the namespace long before these IP lawyers clued their clients into the fact that there was this internet thing out there waiting to bite them in the ass. I admit to being baffled how any corp, big or small, could continue to accept the word of lawfirms that entirely missed the internet, understood it not a whit, were years late in understanding what just about every publication from Readers Digest to Leather Lads Quarterly had already done cover feature articles on, and yet accept that if you give them still more money all will be right with the world. Cynical? Moi? Oui. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com