| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
ICANN Continues to Stonewall on Independent Review
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 3 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Year after year, I read the same sorts of documented complaints, about ICANN, on ICANNwatch. I fear Froomkin, Mueller, and those of that ilk will be older, grayer, 100 years old or more and still nipping at ICANN's heels with mouths void of real teeth.
Same ol', same ol' ... year after year ... on and on ... nothing changes ...
Vint doesn't "... give a crap" ... about this blog.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
| Starting Score: |
0 |
points |
| Moderation |
|
+1 |
|
| Extra 'Insightful' Modifier |
|
0 |
|
| Total Score: |
|
1 |
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
