Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    A Congressional Vote of No Confidence for ICANN | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 29 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:Why is this debate happening?
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday February 06 2004, @05:23PM (#12947)
    User #2810 Info
    OK. You're wrong about this. HTH. :)

    Or only halfway. This [icann.org] is how ICANN wants it handled (see 1 and 2), there are already similar provisions in the ICANN registrar accreditation agreement, and the complaint form (see 3, in fact the whole page is instructive) if used, or if a query is otherwise received, a registrar is supposed to check on the WHOIS accuracy for a given domain. The registrar in turn is supposed to contact the registrant to ensure that the data is or will be made (at present I believe within 15 days) accurate. If it isn't the registrar should cancel the domain, though the registrar is granted some discretion if they feel that a failure to do so on the part of the registrant is innocent.

    So your my-football-blog.net (hey, still available) had better have accurate WHOIS data if anyone (for emphasis anyone) should ask about it or you could lose it. As an aside, as I, and I believe John Berryhill (the search function no longer appears to work), pointed out on the old DNSO [dnso.org] General Assembly list, this is an easy way to get a domain you want if it contains false WHOIS data. Rat them out, put in a drop request for it, wait for it to be dropped, et Voila.

    As my first and second links following show, the Intellectual Property interests, and others who stand to benefit from this (including those nominally within ICANN's tent like Steve Metalitz, Mark Bohannon, and Rick Wesson), despite having disproportionate power within ICANN, are frustrated at ICANN's lack of progress on this issue, so they've gone whining to those gov't reps to whom they perhaps make disproportionate campaign donations. According to my third link following, the provision to yank a domain simply for inaccurate WHOIS data isn't presently within the bill, however Berman wants it added so it may well still wind up in there, and SFAICT the bill does put the onus on registrars to ensure that the WHOIS is accurate, so one presumably winds up with nearly the same result, one can lose one's domain(s) for inaccurate WHOIS data.

    Some coverage...

    washingtonpost.com [icannwatch.org]

    PC World [pcworld.com]

    Reuters [reuters.com]

    Thomas Roessler [does-not-exist.org] points to the testimony records.

    Susan Crawford [blogware.com] doesn't like the bill.

    Wendy Seltzer [seltzer.org] doesn't like it either.

    Ross Rader [byte.org] of registrar Tucows also doesn't like it, and says so with a response from Rick Wesson here [byte.org]

    In a somewhat related story, Google had also recently rolled out an aggregate whois tool, see here [com.com], but pulled it after business partner VeriSign complained they were getting too many queries. For a non-obvious new tool it was getting a lot of work, and I doubt it was all from law enforcement and IP lawyers or other semi-legit entities.

    Finally, the current issue of WiReD magazine has an interesting article [wired.com] regarding what Intellectual Property interests are doing for, or to, America. With gTLD registrations dropping and many ccTLD's registrations rising each year, some by double digits, the IP folks should really grab a clue. If the US passes the wrong laws there are well over 200 other options. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Why is this debate happening? by fnord
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  
    Corrected link
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Friday February 06 2004, @05:49PM (#12948)
    User #2810 Info
    The washingtonpost.com link was seriously malformed, it should have pointed here [washingtonpost.com]. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com