| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
NewTLDs : The Long and Winding Road
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 51 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Yes Ben, I'd be most interested in the results as I imagine many others would be, as your previous work has provided objective, independent, quantitative data that is nowhere else available. One would be hard pressed to use such data to make any other case than that the first ICANN rollout of new TLDs has been anything other than an unmitigated disaster. It is also quite telling that one individual (or two, with Jonathan Zittrain [harvard.edu]) can provide such analyses whilst all the King's horses and all the King's men [icann.org] cannot, nor am I aware of ICANN taking any interest in your research, please correct me if I am wrong. -g
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
Re:Quantitative Methods of TLD Evaluation
by fnord
|
Starting Score: |
1 |
point |
Karma-Bonus Modifier |
|
+1 |
|
Total Score: |
|
2 |
|
|

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|