| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
GNSO Asked to Develop Procedure to Rule on New Registry Services
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 6 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
It's not clear at all who would administer such a process, even when it's designed by the GNSO.
Could be ICANN staff + SECSAC + IAB, for instance.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Give unilateral power to control entry and service offerings to staff or SECSAC? Who on the staff or SECSAC has any regulatory expertise? What criteria do they use? What makes them accountable for bad decisions? What is the procedure for appointing people to SECSAC?
Techies tend to have really simple-minded notions of the interaction between law, economics and technology. Try having a conversation with Paul Vixie about competing roots sometime and you'll see what I mean.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
