ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Public Interest Registry unveils much-anticipated, new website | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 13 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Branding
    by KarlAuerbach on Friday July 11 2003, @11:20AM (#11931)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    PIR seems intent on branding .org as a place for non-profits and public interest organizations.

    .org is not supposed to be restricted in any way. But the connotation that is being created that .org is only for the NPR crowd might push other organizations, particularly conservative churches and political groups, etc into thinking that .org is not open to them.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Branding
    by cambler (chris@ambler.net) on Friday July 11 2003, @12:41PM (#11933)
    User #36 Info | http://onthenet.ambler.net/
    Perhaps, Karl.

    But then, isn't that PIR's decision to make? The registry operator brands their product as they see fit. If they alienate conservative churches and political groups, that just creates a market need for .church and .pol, right?

    Or is that .god? Where's Baptista when you need him? :-)

    Christopher

    --
    Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Branding
    by dmehus on Friday July 11 2003, @12:50PM (#11934)
    User #3626 Info | http://doug.mehus.info/
    I'm not sure that it is PIR's intention to brand .org as only for non-profit charities and political organizations. Their motto does say, "serving the public interest." That said, it implies to me that anyone is free to register a .org domain name, either a non-profit organization or a personal weblog site. Plus, the globe further emphasizes that .org is unrestricted in that its reach and availability stretches to anyone on planet Earth. So, I have not been disappointed with PIR's performance at all. I've found them to be the least self-serving, compared to NeuStar or VeriSign, and they're pretty open and transparent. They post everything they do on their website, and have numerous contact addresses with which to send comments.

    Best,
    Doug
    Doug Mehus http://doug.mehus.info/ [mehus.info]
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Branding
    by Bruce Beckwith on Friday July 11 2003, @01:47PM (#11936)
    User #3777 Info | http://www.pir.org/
    Karl,

    You are absolutely correct - the .org TLD is still not restricted in any fashion. In fact, you will note in the ICANN TLD page that .org is "Unsponsored" (http://www.icann.org/tlds/). It is as possible today, as it was when the prior registry operator was responsible for .org, for anyone to register a domain name in the .org TLD.

    You will also recall in the ICANN RFP for the transition of .org, there was a requirement that there be a responsiveness to the noncommercial Internet user community - specifically Section VII at http://www.icann.org/tlds/org/org-proposal.htm#VII . PIR is proud to have this concept as the main emphasis of our mission statement.

    Bruce Beckwith
    Public Interest Registry
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • Re:Branding by KarlAuerbach Friday July 11 2003, @04:03PM
      • Re:Branding by Ron_Bennett Friday July 11 2003, @07:09PM
        • Re:Branding by KarlAuerbach Friday July 11 2003, @11:44PM
          • Re:Branding by cambler Sunday July 13 2003, @05:10PM
            • Re:Branding by dmehus Sunday July 13 2003, @09:39PM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Branding by dtobias Monday July 14 2003, @11:37AM
    Re:Branding
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Monday July 14 2003, @09:34PM (#11964)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    If a church or political group, whether conservative, liberal, libertarian, or anything else, is run on a not-for-profit basis, why wouldn't they think .org is for them (unless they've been brainwashed into thinking that .com is all that counts, anyway)?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com