Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Gauntlet Thrown Down on ccTLDs? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    I was there
    by vbertola on Thursday March 06 2003, @11:59PM (#11272)
    User #3435 Info | http://bertola.eu.org/
    I didn't expect to go, but as the importance of the meeting seemed to be evident, I went there on my own exploiting the small distance between my home town, Turin, and Geneva (2 borders though ;) ).

    My impression is that it was a success (well organized and very interesting). There was some insistent criticism of ICANN, and yet most people, even among ccTLDs, seemed to think that the reformed ICANN should be given a try and that the 3-party Internet governance model originally devised into ICANN is the way to go.

    The only true consensus from the meeting, though, was the fact that any global Internet policy-making body should not depend on the US Government, and this should be accomplished asap. In fact, this is perhaps the most pressing reason why some countries and ccTLDs are pressing for the ITU to somewhat step in. Especially, developing countries seem to see ITU as a more trustworthy and open forum than ICANN, of which some of them are even unaware. (Well... after a technical presentation, one person actually asked to the speaker "could you explain what you mean by the word "CNAME" - we need to know what it is". But this was the exception, most of the participants were quite prepared.)

    The message I tried to convey there is that even if some of these points (for example, the one related to ultimate control by USG, or the reduced space for users) are agreeable, due to the very characteristics and history of the Internet there is a need for user involvement in Internet policy-making, so the original idea of ICANN as a 3-party governance structure is still valid. Then I pointed out that there is much synergy possible between ccTLDs and our RALOs, and that ccTLDs should encourage their memberships and user representatives to participate in our process. You can read my paper here [itu.int]. In fact, you should at least review the list of submitted papers [itu.int].

    --vb. (Vittorio Bertola)

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:I was there
    by KarlAuerbach on Friday March 07 2003, @11:52AM (#11273)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    A summary of the papers and of some of the discussion may be found at http://www.itu.int/itudoc/itu-t/workshop/cctld/cct ld059.pdf [itu.int]

    By-the-way, I notice that my own submission was dismissed by some ICANN folk at the meeting as being nothing more than my personal opinion. One wonders why the ICANN folks were so defensive - I never said that that ICANN's withholding of IANA services to ccTLDs was an official, board-adopted position of ICANN. ICANN's withholding of IANA services is based on a decision made unilaterally by ICANN's "staff", the board was not involved.

    I'd like to mention that the submissions of ICANN were never approved by the board and thus, to my mind, are really nothing more than the personal opinions of an ICANN employee.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com