| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
Boardsquatting: the sequel?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 5 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
It is no surprise that ICANN has kept all nine non SO Board members.
No doubt they would like Karl gone but if ERC tried to choose some at large directors to stay and some to go they would attract a firestorm of criticism and totally undermine confidence in any future nominating committee.
Now next option would be to have all five at large directors go. However it would be politically untenable to remove them and leave in place the four original unelected directors or board squatters.
So if one wants Karl to go you have to remove all nine non SO Board members and that would leave the Board too small so they have kicked for touch and left them all there.
DPF
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
