ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    sTLDs hoping to enter legacy root Adult entertainment trade association starts letter writing campaign against .XXX
    posted by Mueller on Wednesday September 14 2005, @06:09PM

    Tom Hymes writes "The Free Speech Coalition, the trade association for the adult entertainment industry, has started a letter-writing campaign in opposition to the creation of a .XXX TLD. It can be found here - www.freespeechcoalition.com/xinfo.htm - along with the reasons for our opposition.

    www.fightthedotxxx.com is also gathering company names to send to ICANN.

    I'm sure there are a plethora of opinions here regarding .XXX, many for it, some against it, some indifferent, but whatever you feel about pornography, the wisdom of segregating lawful speech on the Internet, or even the independence of ICANN, please keep in mind that this particular application is for a sponsored TLD, and that contrary to their claims, ICM Registry does not have anywhere near the industry support needed to legitimize this application.

    Unfortunately, while ICANN can hear the Commerce Department and its 6000 religious right letter-writers loud and clear, they become quite deaf when the industry's trade association contacts them. But then, the entire process regarding this .XXX application has been replete with misrepresentations, outright fraudulent claims, and a profound lack of transparency or open communication. Unfortunately, the stakes are far too high to ignore ICANN's lapse of responsibility, which is why we are asking our members, our industry, and everyone who cares about free speech to join us in opposing the approval of .XXX.

    Thanks for your attention, and please help us oppose this bad idea that will not work."



    Statement on USG .xxx Intervention Gains Support

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · ICANN
    · Tom Hymes
    · www.freespeechcoalition.com/xi nfo.htm
    · More sTLDs hoping to enter legacy root stories
    · Also by Mueller
     
    Adult entertainment trade association starts letter writing campaign against .XXX | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 25 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    censorship
    by AmericaAtLarge on Thursday September 15 2005, @12:56PM (#16224)
    User #4126 Info | http://americeatlarge.org/
    What you are trying to do is, in effect, to impose your moral values and to censor ideas. This shouldn't be tolerated any more than ICANN's wavering on issues.

    -RJ

    AmericaAtLarge.us
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    About those "6,000" letters
    by jberryhill on Thursday September 22 2005, @03:43PM (#16228)
    User #3013 Info

    What Mr. Hymes fails to point out, and what is well-known to anyone paying attention, is that those "6,000 letters" to Commerce were automated emails sent from a religious/political website with a "submit" button, the URL of which was posted on an adult webmaster forum along with the suggestion that those opposed to the proposal go and hit the button.

    It is not unusual on the internet for people to disagree about any particular proposal or idea. Those opposed to .xxx are not required to participate, to register a domain name, or indeed to care one way or another. Is it surprising that there is a tinfoil-hat brigade who believes that a TLD within a computer network addressing system would spell the end of the world? Not really. Where were these people during the public comment period, or indeed during the several years that this application has been on the table?

    But, why bother to actually engage in the process when you can collect donations by persuading the persuadable that the end of the world is near.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 14 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml.