USA Goverment Relations Statement on USG .xxx Intervention Gains Support
posted by Mueller on Sunday August 28 2005, @02:53PM

Responding to the .xxx intervention by the US Commerce Department, the Internet Governance Project has produced a "STATEMENT OPPOSING POLITICAL INTERVENTION IN THE INTERNET’S CORE TECHNICAL ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS." You can view the statement here and add your name as a signatory at the bottom. Over 60 people from the ICANN and WSIS comunities have endorsed it so far.

The Statement claims that "The NTIA’s recent intervention in the .xxx proceeding undermines assurances" that the U.S. government's special unilateral authority over ICANN "would never be used to shape policy but was only a means of protecting the stability of the organization and its processes." The NTIA's open acknowledgment of the influence of religious groups made the intervention particularly dangerous. The Statement notes that "The new voice and power being given to national governments contrasts sharply with the powerlessness of individual domain name registrants within ICANN, who, despite being the most significant stakeholder in the system, were deprived of their right to vote for ICANN Board members in 2002."



Acknowledging WSIS pressure to revise the oversight relationship between ICANN and governments, the Statement says that "If there are to be any government-imposed limitations or constraints on the global name space, they should meet the most stringent procedural and substantive standards, such as: * A well-defined process controlling when and in what form governments are permitted to intervene in the TLD addition process; * General principles defining what criteria can be used to justify a decision to refuse to permit the addition of a particular name and (equally important) what criteria are not admissible * Very high levels of agreement, or complete consensus, among governments before any veto could be taken."

The statement concludes: "In reviewing its decision regarding the .xxx delegation, we urge the ICANN Board to be mindful of the future, and of the Internet’s legacy of freedom. Its decision must take into account the need to restrain the influence of national politics and content regulation advocacy on the Internet's operation. We urge it not to make any concessions or statements that would encourage more such interventions in the future. We urge the world’s governments to take a more deliberative and procedurally sound approach to the reform of ICANN."

More arbitrary GAC interference in TLDs | Adult entertainment trade association starts letter writing campaign against .XXX  >

 
  ICANNWatch Login  
Nickname:

Password:

[ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

 
  Related Links  
· CORE
· US Nat'l Telecom & Info Admin.
· ICANN
· Internet Governance Project
· view the statement here
· More USA Goverment Relations stories
· Also by Mueller
 
Statement on USG .xxx Intervention Gains Support | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 100 comments | Search Discussion
Click this button to post a comment to this story
The options below will change how the comments display
Threshold:
Check box to change your default comment view
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Re:Hey ICANNwatch
by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Thursday September 01 2005, @08:10AM (#16148)
User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
It's a little ironic that this criticism of the (admittedly nutcase) anonymous poster is coming from somebody who is likewise anonymous.

I really think it would be a good idea for this site to ban anonymous posting altogether.
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
Re:http://Whois.NY.US ? http://Whois.FL.US ?
by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Thursday September 01 2005, @08:23AM (#16149)
User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
"whois.fl.us could not be found. Please check the name and try again."
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 57 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml.