ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    New gTLDs Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illegal Lottery
    posted by Michael on Wednesday July 25, @02:34AM

    According to a posting by Mike Palage to the Registrars Constituency, a class action lawsuit was filed earlier this week alleging that the .biz registration process is an unfair and deceptive trade practice in violation of section 17200 of the California Business & Professions Code because it is running as an illegal lottery. The suit names ICANN, Neulevel (the ICANN-selected .biz registry), dotbizlottery.com, and a host of registrars who sell .biz registrations as the defendants (full list below).

    I am not a California lawyer, so don't take my comments to the bank, but a claim that .biz is being run as an illegal lottery would seem to have some merit to it; indeed, contributors to ICANNWatch have discussed this issue previously (see The (illegal) .biz Sweepstakes ). I would not like to be the lawyer who has to explain the dotbizlottery web site to a judge, or even how I created the conditions that made it possible. Nor is it necessarily obvious how other registrars' policies differ from it in a legally significant way if they take money for a chance to register an attractive .biz name and don't give full refunds in the event the registration doesn't go through (even if they are less shameless in the marketing department).

    We'll post a link to the complaint as soon as someone is kind enough to send us one, or identify a link to it.UPDATE: Bret Fausett has posted a .pdf of a scan of the complaint.



    Here's the case caption (list of parties):

    David Scott Smiley, dba Smiley Productions LLC, Skyscraper Productions LLC
    v.
    Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers, Neulevel Inc., Abacus America Inc., Alldomains.com, Blueberry Hill Communications Inc., Bulkregister.com Inc., Catalog.com Inc., Domain Registration Services, Inc., Dotster Inc., Emarkmonitor Inc., Enom Inc., Go Dadday Software Inc., Intercosmos Media Group Inc., Namesecure Inc., Network Solutions Inc., Parava Networks Inc., Register.com Inc., The Registry At Info Avenue, Verisign Inc., Domain Bank Inc., Cydian Technologies LLC, #1 Domain Names International Inc., 007Names, Inc., 1 Enameco, 123 Registration, Inc., 21 Company, 4Domains.com, BB Online UK Ltd., Core Internet Council of Registrars, Corporate Domains, Inc., CSL Computer Services Langenbach, Cybersearch-US, Inc., Direct Information PVT Ltd., Diversity Network Services, Domain-It! Inc., Domaininfo, Domainnameregistration.com, Domainpeople, Inc., Dotbizlottery.com, Edifax Internet Services LLC, Firstdomain.net, G+D International LLC, Gal Communications, Ltd, I.D.R. Internet Domain Registry, Internet Domain Registrars, Internetregistration.com LLC, Markmonitor, Melbourne It Limited, Nameengine Inc., Namescout.com Corp., NDN Registry, Netbenefit, Netlogin, Netpia.com Inc., Nominalia Internet SL, Onlinenic, Inc, Procurement Services Inc., Rapid Host, Reserveme.com, Signdomain.com, Spy Productions.com, The Nameit Corp., Tucows Inc., Virtual Internet PLC, Web Express Inc., Web Costasol, Webcity Australia Pty Ltd., Worldwidemedia.com

    Useful links:

    The (illegal) .biz Sweepstakes
    Was the gTLD Selection Process an Illegal Contest?

    5 - 10 companies expected to bid for .us | gTLD Registry Constituency Memo re. ccTLD Supporting Organization  >

     

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • The (illegal) .biz Sweepstakes
  • Was the gTLD Selection Process an Illegal Contest?
  • a posting
  • section 17200 of the California Business & Professions Code
  • Neulevel
  • dotbizlottery.com
  • .pdf of a scan of the complaint
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illegal Lottery | Login/Create an Account | Top | 52 comments | Search Discussion
    Threshold:
    The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them.
    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by Buckshot6 on Thursday August 02, @12:22PM (#1573)
    User #2948 Info
    As of today, the Attorney General of Texas, has agreed to file a lawsuit against the parties to recover damages due to the state of Texas and its citizens. Under the anti-lottery statues of Texas.

    I see more states to follow this coure of action.

    Be sure to file a complaint in your state with your Attormey General.



    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by Buckshot6 on Monday July 30, @09:37AM (#1537)
    User #2948 Info
    July 30, 2001



    Suit Filed in Registration of Domain Names

    By SUSAN STELLIN

    nternet users upset about the process for registering addresses with the new dot-biz extension have complained that the system is being run like a lottery, and a new lawsuit says that is exactly what it is.

    The lawsuit, filed last Monday in Los Angeles Superior Court, says that because the company in charge of the dot-biz domain, NeuLevel Inc., charges a $2 fee merely to submit an application for an address, with plans to select one application at random if there are multiple requests for the same address, the system qualifies as an illegal lottery in California and the 49 other states.

    "It's an illegal lottery," said Derek Newman, a lawyer with Newman & Newman in Seattle, one of three law firms handling the case, "because people are paying money but they're not getting anything in return."

    If there are multiple applications for one address, those who file unsuccessful applications will not get a refund on their application fee. Companies that register Internet addresses on behalf of the public, known as registrars, are passing along NeuLevel's $2 fee to customers, plus fees of their own for the service of submitting an application.

    Besides NeuLevel, based in Sterling, Va., the suit, which is seeking class-action status, names as defendants the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the organization responsible for the Internet's address system; and more than 60 companies accredited by Icann to register dot-biz domain names.

    Jeff Neuman, NeuLevel's director of policy and intellectual property, declined to comment on the case, as did a spokeswoman for Icann, which approved the contract governing the rollout of dot-biz addresses — one of seven new extensions being added to the Internet's address system.

    But on Thursday, NeuLevel issued a statement saying: "We believe that the dot-biz domain name selection process is the most fair and equitable way to distribute domain names. We believe the lawsuit is without merit and has been filed in an attempt to derail the successful introduction of dot-biz."

    The plaintiffs named in the suit are David Scott Smiley, a radio D.J. from Scottsdale, Ariz., who Mr. Newman said had tried to register radio.biz and dj.biz; and Skyscraper Productions, which offers traffic safety courses online and which hopes to register trafficschool.biz.

    But they are not the only ones to question the process.

    "Somebody had raised the issue a while back on a mailing list," said Larry Erlich, president of the Internet registrar DomainRegistry.com. "And at that point I thought, `That's a good point; I'll look into it.' "

    Mr. Erlich said he was unable to get satisfactory assurance from NeuLevel or Icann that the system was not a lottery, so he decided not to accept applications for dot-biz addresses, although his company was still named as a defendant in the suit.

    "They should not have included us," he said. "We've stated very clearly on our Web site that we're not taking applications. And luckily we didn't at this point."

    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by fnord (d_d@email.com) on Thursday July 26, @04:54PM (#1493)
    User #2810 Info
    Bret Fausett has posted NeuLevel's response, in .pdf. -g
    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by fnord (d_d@email.com) on Thursday July 26, @01:16PM (#1485)
    User #2810 Info
    Coverage from Internet World. -g
    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by fnord (d_d@email.com) on Thursday July 26, @06:27PM (#1494)
    User #2810 Info
    This is getting to be a habit. :) Yahoo coverage. -g
    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by fnord (d_d@email.com) on Thursday July 26, @04:32PM (#1492)
    User #2810 Info
    More coverage from Infoworld. -g
    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by fnord (d_d@email.com) on Thursday July 26, @01:39PM (#1486)
    User #2810 Info
    and better coverage from WIRED. -g
    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by Buckshot6 on Wednesday July 25, @03:03AM (#1458)
    User #2948 Info
    What goes around, comes around. I hope they all get screwed.....

    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by finee (Please visit www.FineE.com to get contact information) on Wednesday July 25, @07:15AM (#1460)
    User #2781 Info | http://www.FineE.com
    The list of registrars being accused of running an illegal lottery is quite impresive. When one considers that this action only involves one state in one country, and many of these businesses operate worldwide the implications are well scary.

    There are however registrars that have not participated in the .biz lottery and consequently are not being being accused of running an illegal lottery.

    One of the registrars that is NOT named in this action is GKG (Global Knowledge Group) and after reading this article I must say I am very pleased to have chosen them as a regsitrar, for both my own domain registrations and the domain registrations I offer to the public as a reseller on my site www.FineE.com
    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by finee (Please visit www.FineE.com to get contact information) on Wednesday July 25, @01:16PM (#1463)
    User #2781 Info | http://www.FineE.com
    Sorry to dissapoint you but Tucows is on the list.

    If you are dealing with a Tucows reseller / affiliate that did not engage in this alleged illegal lottery you could still be affected. In fact I would concern myself here more with the registrar than the reseller / affiliate.

    Of course this is all speculation but you may wish to consider how a .com registrant with one of the registrars mentioned in the complaint would be affected if the court finds for the plaintiffs.

    Thank you very much for finding and posting this information. It makes for very interesting and revealing reading

    Re: Class Action Alleges ICANN's .biz Is an Illega
    by ldg (jandl@sybercom.net) on Saturday July 28, @10:07AM (#1523)
    User #2935 Info
    I would think that only the Tucows resellers who are participating in the lottery would be affected. I'll stab at a guess that most of them are not.
    Re: http://www.nic.biz/aboutnl/07262001.html
    by fnord (d_d@email.com) on Saturday July 28, @05:38PM (#1528)
    User #2810 Info
    Why crosspost these here where readers don't get the full thread? Give them a link and/or say something that adds value to the mix, assuming that you actually have something to say. FWIW, the above .biz link resolves using new.net's plugin so I don't have to depend on Kent Crispin to do anything for me. -g


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com