Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Registrars Is the rug to be pulled out from under registrants?
    posted by michael on Thursday October 22 2009, @11:22AM

    Anonymous writes "Please be notified of the window for public comment on a white collar hoax perpetrated by ICANN and big name registrars (Go Daddy), before this becomes reality!

    Available for public comment right now through November 16th, Verisign seeks approval of an amendment for its process of Bulk Transfer After Partial Portfolio Acquisition (BTAPPA)in dot-COM and dot-NET: http://www.icann.com/en/announcements/announcement-16oct09-en.htm

    Verisign requested approval of a Bulk Transfer After Partial Portfolio Acquisition (BTAPPA) process from ICANN in July, with the amendment for 15-day notice to registrants. The amendment is open for public comment through November 16th, in a low-key announcement in one domain name publication, [likely] so ICANN, Verisign, Go Daddy, and other big-name registrars can slide it by the public!

    Go Daddy applied for a patent for a method of selling equity in domain names in July: http://domainnamewire.com/2009/07/02/godaddy-files-patent-for-method-of-selling-equity-in-domain-nam es

    Quote from amendment:

    "If an acquisition, Losing Registrar must agree to provide at least fifteen (15) day prior written notice of the partial Bulk Transfer to all registrants associated with domain names involved in the transfer. Notice must include: (i) a statement that all Transfers Rules and Policies set by ICANN and the Registry shall remain in effect; (ii) instructions on how a registrant can opt-out of bulk transfer in the event that the Losing Registrar has indicated that it is willing to continue to serve as the registrar for the domain name."
    Is the rug to be pulled from under registrants' feet? Will registrants enter a new era where the registrar they believed would maintain domain name server space for life be tempted to start selling shares in, or selling sponsorships (maintenance of domain name server) of domain names, or sell "partial portfolios" in bulk, so that the registrants [our] choice is now restricted, with a 15-day notice?

    What about domains which are set to expire, and can't be moved within 30 days of expiration date? According to the amendment, "all Transfers Rules and Policies set by ICANN and the Registry shall remain in effect." If your domain is set to expire, you would be stuck.

    How is 15-day notice "Consistent with ICANN?s obligation to promote and encourage robust competition in the domain name space?" [registrars compete for our business]

    This is an outrage! ICANNwatch has a domain name, many of you have domain names, and commercial giants might also be affected, not just a little guy, like me!

    Please go here and check pertinent documents linked to: http://www.icann.com/en/announcements/announcement-16oct09-en.htm

    and please make your opinion known!

    This is coupled with the disturbing provision of the new gTLD Applicant Guidebook to allow price increases by the registrar. See: http://domainnamewire.com/2009/10/05/latest-top-level-domain-guidebook-allows-com-prices-to-skyrocket"

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
    · VeriSign/NSI
    · ICANN
    · http://domainnamewire.com/2009 /07/02/godaddy-files-patent-fo r-method-of-selling-equity-in- domain-nam es
    · http://www.icann.com/en/announ cements/announcement-16oct09-e n.htm
    · http://domainnamewire.com/2009 /10/05/latest-top-level-domain -guidebook-allows-com-prices-t o-skyrocket
    · More Registrars stories
    · Also by michael
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Is the rug to be pulled out from under registrants? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    RE: Is the rug to be pulled out from under registr
    by Louise on Monday October 26 2009, @12:24PM (#17005)
    User #4835 Info
    Pondering this arrangement, where one registrar makes overtures to another registrar to acquire domains within the Losing Registrar's portfolio, the WINNING registrar can leverage the purchase with future profits of raising the price later!

    Registrars have access to traffic info, which informs them which domains are more valuable, what the domain name holder can afford to pay once the transaction is complete, and they may base their offer on that!

    Mondo exploitation by the registrar of its access to traffic info!

    Let's all write the
    SEC Complaint Center
    100 F Street NE
    Washington, D.C. 20549-0213
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    RE: Is the rug to be pulled out from under?
    by Louise on Saturday October 31 2009, @08:26AM (#17006)
    User #4835 Info
    Here it is: Verisign sells insider information to Registrars, flagrantly pitching it right on its website!

    "By better segmenting and targeting customers and prospects, registrars can improve domain name registration and renewal rates, and identify new business opportunities."

    - Internet Profile Service for Registrars [verisign.com]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com