ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    New gTLDs dot-XXX is FUD
    posted by tbyfield on Saturday January 27 2007, @08:26AM

    Seth_Finkelstein writes "I have a Guardian column opposing the .XXX domain. I contend the motivation for the domain has nothing to do with children. Instead, the registry is playing trademark-holders, speculators, and site-owners, against each other in a game of fear, uncertainty, and doubt - and collecting a large fee no matter who wins."


     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · Seth_Finkelstein
    · Guardian
    · opposing the .XXX domain
    · More New gTLDs stories
    · Also by tbyfield
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    dot-XXX is FUD | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    The Finkelstein Column is the FUD
    by lextext on Saturday January 27 2007, @09:45AM (#16909)
    User #6 Info | http://www.lextext.com
    I appreciate the fact that for an editorial Seth is working under the typical 500 word constraints, but he dismisses the value of a new TLD too easily: "Too much of the punditry about this consists of repeating clichés about kids and red lights." You can't dismiss the many arguments about using labeling to identify content in one sentence by calling them cliches.

    And to dismiss a new TLD because "it provides no additional technical value" is to keep the name space flat at .COM, .NET and .ORG for eternity. No new TLD provides any additional technical value. They are all intended to provide additional user choice for naming and identification. That's all.

    Does this have value to users? Of course it does. It allows people who wish to identify their content with finer detail than whether they are commercial or an organization to have an appropriate extension. It also allows the receivers of content to have a better understand of what sort of content to expect. .TRAVEL, .JOB, .MUSEUM, .AERO -- whatever their relative merits -- perform a similar function. You may not choose to use it, but those who do see the value.

                  Bret

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Content should not be ICANN's concern
    by KarlAuerbach on Saturday January 27 2007, @06:30PM (#16912)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    ICANN's purpose is to ensure that the upper tiers of the domain name system operates reliably, efficiently, and accurately as measured by the transformation of doman name query packets into domain name response packets.

    ICANN's attempts to inquire into the content and purpose of domain names is an exercise well beyond ICANN's purpose and transforms ICANN from a needed technical protective role into that of an internet content nanny.

    The idea that a private organization, a combination of incumbent business interests that excludes the public, can sit and decide who may and who may not enter a business marketplace, dictate product descriptions and prices, and impose conditions upon customers, is an idea that is repugnant to our notions of fair and open competition. .XXX may not be the most felicitious of purposes, but the people who are promoting it have a right to engage in any non-illegal business without having to submit their plans for the approval of ICANN.

    My own complaint about .XXX is that there are so many other worthy applications - including 40 left over and still pending from year 2000 - that deserve at least as much consideration, and approaval, as .XXX has obtained.

    The obscenity about .XXX is not the content. Rather it is the way in which the US Government launders the policy of right-wing religious groups through a private corporation, ICANN. This damages our system of Constitutional government, erodes the distinction between public and private actors, and eliminates the safety checks that we have learned are necessary to control executive administrative agencies.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com