Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Privacy A Good Day for Privacy in Washington
    posted by michael on Wednesday July 19 2006, @11:20PM

    kathrynkl@aol.com writes "Yesterday, the House Financial Services Committee held a hearing on Whois titled “ICANN and the Whois Database: Providing Access to Protect Consumers from Phishing." NTIA, FTC, Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), the Financial Services Roundtable and the Software and Information Industry Assoc. (SIIA) all testified. I am very happy to say that the privacy issues got a great airing – and not just from EPIC.

    On the first panel sat John M. R. Kneuer, Acting Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information, and he read the traditional USG position: “The Department of Commerce strongly supports continued, timely access to accurate and publicly available WHOIS data contained in the databases of information identifying registrants of domain names.” (all quotes are from the written testimony).

    What came as more of a surprise is that the Federal Trade Commission broke ranks with the rest of US Government. Eileen Harrington, Deputy Director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection, said: “The FTC, as the primary enforcement agency for U.S. consumer privacy and data security laws, is very concerned about protecting consumers’ privacy. Thus, the Commission has always recognized that registrants engaged in non-commercial activity may require some privacy protection from public access to their contact information, without compromising appropriate real-time access by law enforcement agencies.”

    Marc Rotenberg, President of EPIC, drove home the critical point that consumers fall on both sides of the Whois issue, including the millions of domain name registrants whose personal data is disclosed (without any choice) in the Whois directory: “With identity theft the number one crime against consumers in the United States, there is understandable concern about the improper disclosure of personal information on the Internet. The WHOIS database performs a critical function by helping to ensure the security and stability of the Internet. But making the data in WHOIS available to anyone without any accountability creates real risks to the privacy and security of Internet users.”

            Even for this author, a veteran of the Whois Task Force for over four years, there were some new and surprising things said in the hearing. Mark Bohannon, Senior VP of SIIA, in Q&A, said that human rights groups should not register domain names if they do not want to reveal all of their personal data (even if it meant their arrest in countries that bar organizing for democratic reforms), and added that he seriously questioned whether human rights organizations would even want to use websites for these purposes. Clearly Bohannon does not live in the same world I do – one where human rights and free speech groups gravitate to the gTLDs because the political and personal speech they post online (and very much want people to see) is not allowed in their own countries. It is information posted at great personal risk, and to me, is the highest form of the Internet. When Rotenberg questioned Bohannon about whether his clients really supported limiting who has access to domain names and websites, Bohannon retracted the statement.

            Congressman Pearce raised his teenage granddaughter and her possible access to websites, even with noncommercial content, that he did not approve of. Didn’t all the panelists support a utility that would allow anyone, at any time, to click on a domain name and go directly into the Whois to find out who was sending the message or posting the website? Rotenberg responded: won’t the Congressman be dismayed if his teenage granddaughter, starting up a website, was forced to disclose her name, home address, personal telephone and personal email for all to see? Cong. Pearce responded that if she was posting a website and holding her ideas out to the public, she should be fully identified.

            I wonder whether the Congressman has heard of the right to private and anonymous political speech protected by the First Amendment? Has he read the decision of McIntyre vs. Ohio Elections Commission (Supreme Ct 1995) which holds up anonymous political speech as a way of expressing minority views – and input critical to a free society? Does it matter that the policies he advocates would bar the next Mark Twain or George Sand – people writing under pseudonyms and pennames to express important ideas in way that would not lead immediately back to them and their families?

            Fascinating reading at the Committee’s hearing website. All testimony is posted.

    Kathryn Kleiman
    Co-Founder, ICANN’s Noncommercial Users Constituency
    Longtime member, ICANN’s Whois Task Force"

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
    · US Nat'l Telecom & Info Admin.
    · ICANN
    · the written testimony
    · posted.
    · kathrynkl@aol.com
    · More Privacy stories
    · Also by michael
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    A Good Day for Privacy in Washington | Log in/Create an Account | Top | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com