| ||At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN||
Palage Resigns from ICANN Board
posted by michael on Wednesday April 05 2006, @08:17AM
According to a letter dated April 3, 2006, forwarded to me by a reliable registrar, Michael Palage resigned from the ICANN Board, effective two days ago, Monday. Palage's term was due to run until June 2008.
I have not been able to confirm this:
I will update this post when I know more.
- So far this doesn't appear to be reflected on the ICANN site which still lists him as a member of the Board of Directors
- As of this writing, the archive of the GNSO Council Mailing list, which says it was last updated on 2006 Apr 05, contains no entries dated after March 26, 2006, even though this message was copied to that list. (But then again, the GNSO hates cross-posting.)
- I called ICANN at 9:45 AM California time and was told that there was no one in the office I could speak to about this. I was directed to leave voice mail for the press office, which I did.
- I also left voice mail at Mr. Palage's office in Florida, but haven't heard back yet
[Update: 04/05 17:10 GMT by Michael: I now have confirmation from another reliable source.]
[Update: 04/05 22:33 GMT by Michael: - I've spoken to Michael Palage and he confirms the story. ICANN never called me back. (Some press office, huh?)]
Here's the text of the resignation letter forwarded to me:
From: email@example.comThere has always been a major tension between the corporatist design of ICANN (in which conflicts of interest are a design feature, not but) and the US-style idea of preventing conflicts of interest. In the past ICANN has rarely enforce its conflict rules, and at least in some cases even when Directors announced they would not vote on an issue they took part in its consideration.
[mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Michael D. Palage
Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 8:59 AM
Cc: John Jeffrey; email@example.com
Subject: [registrars] FYI
Dear GNSO Council,
Effective immediately, I hereby resign from the ICANN Board of Directors.
What I would now like to do now is briefly explain the basis for my decision
so that there is no speculation or conjecture.
Over the past year I have thought about resigning from the ICANN Board.
This is a decision which I had shared privately with a number of people
including some of my fellow directors. Although I came to the ICANN Board
with a number of ties to the industry based upon my consulting arrangements
with various registration authorities, over the past year it has become
increasingly difficult for me to do the best job that this organization
deserves because of my various professional relationships.
This was something that was further reinforced during the Board's Conflict
Committee Meeting which I participated in last week.
As I look ahead at a number of the challenges that this organization faces,
I feel that I can best contribute by going back to the "bottom"
in the bottom up consensus process. This decision has been made easier
because of some of the change which is currently taking place within the
ICANN Board. Although the community, particularly the GNSO, may question
some of the recent decisions of the Board, I can give you my word that
things are slowly changing in the right direction. Moreover, if I did not
believe in the long term health of this organization, I would not continue
my involvement in it. In the future please look to the IP Constituency,
Registrar, Registry and Business constituencies for my continued involvement
within the GNSO, as well as the ALAC if they accept my offer to help out.
As this body considers selecting my replacement, I urge it to consider the
very important crossroads at which ICANN stands. In my opinion there are
very few people that have the ability to step in and make the necessary
impact that the ICANN stakeholder community deserves.
[ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com