| | At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
| |
|
|
|
 kids.us Playground Nearly Deserted
posted by michael on Wednesday June 08 2005, @07:13PM
fnord writes "Two years after the USG mandated childsafe second level domain kids.us opened for business, it hosts, one can hardly say boasts, a scant 21 live websites.Some in the US Congress were critical of ICANN after it failed to okay a .kids TLD in its 2000 new TLD round, Following an unsuccessful attempt in 2001 during which a dangerous precedent would have been set in which the USG would require ICANN to set up a .kids sTLD, Congress then overwhelmingly passed the (now apparently mis-named) DotKids Implementation and Efficiency Act of 2002 [pdf]. The theory was that sites vetted as appropriate for children under the age of 13 would be registered as third level domains, eg: goat.kids.us. Parents, schools, etc. could then configure filters or browsers to only accept *.kids.us name responses. In practice an average of less than one new site per month can hardly be called a qualified success. While kids.us operator (and ICANN registry) NeuStar says they're not disappointed, the less charitable
might call kids.us a complete flop to date. An Internet Explorer browser plugin that also attempts to follow the guidelines of the Act has similarily met with limited success. The Reuters news article linked to above gives numerous theories to explain the lacklustre response, including the $400/yr to register and the lack of publicity, both of which are largely NeuStar's responsibility. They may be left to carry the can for this. How about that? A failed selective namespace implementation that can't be blamed on ICANN. There may be relevant lessons to be learned from this though, including that government(s) perhaps shouldn't get so directly involved in the namespace, they really don't know what they're doing. It will be interesting to see whether ICANN's controversial newly minted .xxx for adult sites will be more successful through using voluntary inclusion than kids.us (and most ICANN sTLDs) have been through using involuntary exclusion. -g"
|
|
|
|
| |
[ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]
|
|
| | |
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
kids.us Playground Nearly Deserted
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 8 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
|
|
You make a good observation fnord. .kids.us is a flop for a variety of reasons, including the extreme requirements for setting up a website in the space. Let the market take its course and let's see how a voluntary program will work before trying to mandate how it should be done. Let's not be China.
|
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| | 7 replies beneath your current threshold. |
Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|
