ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    IANA Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs)
    Global poker game for the internet goes on
    posted by michael on Tuesday May 03 2005, @09:02AM

    Fergie writes "Kieren McCarthy writes in The Register that:

    A new front has opened up in the global battle for control of the internet, with a heated exchange of letters between two of the main players.

    The chairman of Centr - an organisation representing the needs and wishes of a large part of the world's internet registries - has fired a broadside at internet overseeing organisation ICANN following a letter from ICANN that dismissed his organisation's complaints.

    In the most recent letter, dated 29 April, Centr chairman Paul Kane made his points bluntly, accusing ICANN of being a quasi-regulator and a "United States private-sector company" from which sovereign nations would not accept orders. He outlined the main concerns with ICANN and made it clear that unless ICANN started accepting a relationship of equals, it would not get the support it needs.

    "

    [Editor's note: This Register article is really a don't-miss read. -mf]


     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · The Register (UK)
    · ICANN
    · Fergie
    · writes in The Register
    · Centr
    · More IANA stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Global poker game for the internet goes on | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 15 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Paul Kane Just Wants to Hide All His 2-Letter TLDs
    by Anonymous on Tuesday May 03 2005, @07:58PM (#15070)
    Paul Kane Just Wants to Hide All His 2-Letter TLDs

    With the growing ICANN Staff, and growing ICANN
    budget, more and more eyes can be placed on each
    TLD. That is scrutiny that people like Paul Kane
    do not want.

    The ICANN Staff and the U.S. Government will
    naturally start asking how one guy could get so
    many 2-letter TLDs. Does Paul Kane think he is
    a country ?

    The ICANN agenda under Paul Twomey is to of
    course move 2-letter TLDs to governments. Paul
    Twomey comes from the clueless GAC faction.
    As they become educated and/or encouraged by
    ICANN, countries want their TLD gold-mines.
    People like Paul Kane of course do not want to
    give up those TLDs and the profits.

    What is ironic is that many of the players
    around ICANN continue finding themselves in a
    strange situation. They fund ICANN to deploy
    the weapons that are used to destroy the funders.
    ICANN of course finds new funders, as they
    push old players aside. ICANN works the divide
    and conquer path, one TLD at a time.

    Paul Kane must feel like a guy with pockets
    full of cash surrounded by dozens of pick-pockets.
    As he covers one pocket, they attack another.
    ICANN will pick Paul Kane bare, along with many
    other players that set themselves up to look
    like countries.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Poker ?
    by AmericaAtLarge on Wednesday May 04 2005, @01:03PM (#15085)
    User #4126 Info | http://americeatlarge.org/
    All valid concerns, but do we really want a government controlling it all? Well, maybe the UN, but imagine how long it would take to steer issues.

    Private organizations, not-for-profit, could do good things for the Internet, while government entities will focus on restrictions and hindering the technology.

    What we are experiencing is a dynamic of 'new stuff'. We all should join together to promote dialog on this issue.

    -RJGlass, A@L
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com