ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    IP Numbers Board of Directors
    Auerbach Accuses Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation
    posted by michael on Monday April 11 2005, @04:55AM

    Former ICANN Director Karl Auerbach has some harsh things to say about the Board's performance at the latest ICANN meeting:
    I see that ICANN's Board approved several resolutions concerning IP address allocations.

    Among these resolutions was one in which ICANN's Board unanimously adopted an "IPv4 Global Allocation Policy".

    IP address allocation policy is the most crucial matter ever to come before ICANN's board.  IP addresses are the fuel on which the internet runs.  Without an IP address a person or computer is simply not part of the internet.  A policy that says who can get addresses and under what terms has a breathtaking impact on the shape of future internet growth.  Such a policy will have a significant impact on what enterprises survive and what enterprises fail.  The economic and social ramifications of IP address policy vastly overshadow the effects of ICANN's domain name policies.

    Any policy regarding IP address allocation, therefore, ought to be made only with the greatest degree of lucidity and with the greatest attention to its technical, economic, and social effects.

    Unfortunately, once again, ICANN fiddled and danced - and made jokes - and avoided the difficult, but necessary, work of actually engaging with the issues of this extremely important matter.





    Karl continues:
    The resolution adopting this policy asserts the following "facts":

    "the Board has considered the public comments that were submitted to the forum"

    [the Board] "determined that existing procedures adequately address the issues that were raised

    [N]o objection was raised by the Security and Stability Advisory Committee or other ICANN advisory bodies

    There were four comments made on this policy during its comment period.  All of these comments cited substantial concrete concerns about fundamental aspects of the policy.

    ICANN has never responded to any of these comments.  There is no reason to believe that ICANN's Board or any board member is even aware of those comments.

    I challenge ICANN to demonstrate that any board member ever read these comments, much less considered them when making his or her decision on the IPv4 address policy.

    As for the board's assertion that "existing procedures adequately address the issues that were raised".  Hogwash.  There is no indication that the board or any of its members actually reached this conclusion except by being led to it by the nose by "staff".  And the assertion is also factually incorrect.  Not one of the concerns raised is covered by any existing procedures.

    And finally - as for objections by the so-called "Security and Stability Advisory Committee":  Because that committee operates in total secrecy how can anyone tell what that committee says or does?

    And there's even more at the Cavebear Blog.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · ICANN
    · four comments made on this policy during its comment period
    · Cavebear Blog
    · Karl Auerbach has some harsh things to say about the Board's performance at the latest ICANN meeting
    · ICANN's Board approved several resolutions concerning IP address allocations
    · and made jokes
    · More IP Numbers stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Auerbach Accuses Board of Dereliction of Duty on IP Allocation | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 26 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • 13 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com