ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    sTLDs hoping to enter legacy root Happy Anniversary ICANN!
    posted by michael on Sunday March 20 2005, @08:00PM

    Mike Sorros writes "Remember last year's March 15th? The deadline for the submission of applications for new "Sponsored Top Level Domains"? Yes, already a year passed and we still have no decision of how many, which strings and when these new sTLDs will be entered into the root.



    Some applicants did receive a "go" from ICANN's board to enter into commercial and technical negotiations with ICANN, but this is far from a final approval by the ICANN board...

    Congratulation ICANN! You made it, again! No minutes have been published for the last three board meetings in regard to the status of the pending applications, which is far from what someone would call an open and transparent process...

    Even worse, it seems as the board is trying to regulate on a TLD-to-TLD basis and is restricting the namespace (see the ".mobi" application)...

    Give it a break!

    Do you call the ".net" contract a contract someone running a for-profit business in the real world would ever sign? Will the ".mobi" consortium sign such a contract?

    Worse, would any "real" business sign up for yet-to-be-determined "consensus" policies, knowing that no "consensus" ever needs to be even vetted, much less reached?

    I agree completely with Susan Crawford: "This {contract} isn't negotiable, as a matter of reality." Will the sTLD applicants have any choice other than accept every part in the contract ICANN dictates, even limitations?

    Especially for smaller organizations the answer is clearly: No! But what about the ".mobi" initiative? Will they stand-up against ICANN's dictatorship?

    What if all the ".mobi" members can't live with ICANN's dictates and decide to turn away?

    What if all the ".mobi" members decide to turn away, set-up their own root-servers and serve their millions (or even billions) of customers by their own infrastructure, which would generally be in legacy mode of the DoC root servers with the little tiny addition of ".mobi", ".mobile", simply ".m" or whatever they would prefer?

    What could ICANN do against such a large industry consortium such as ".mobi"? What if ICANN looses all support of industry leaders such as Vodafone, Nokia, T-Mobile, Samsung and all the others? Will ICANN survive the next few years, independent of what will be decided in Tunis (WSIS)? My bet is a clear NO!

    Watch out ICANN or you soon will be in court again for "restraint of trade"..."


    [Editor's note - apologies for not running this on the 15th. Your editors have been distracted. -mf]

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · ICANN
    · Mike Sorros
    · More sTLDs hoping to enter legacy root stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Happy Anniversary ICANN! | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 16 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re:Happy Anniversary - Verisign is Celebrating
    by watchdog on Monday March 21 2005, @04:15PM (#14704)
    User #4058 Info
    Suckers is it exactly. You are one of the few people (other than the people who are actually involved and benefiting - ie. Verisign excecutives and senior officers at ICANN) who are actually aware of what is going on. Most people don't even believe their beloved U.S. government would turn a blind eye if this were true...people here are just too naive and don't understand the scams at the highest levels of business.

    Verisign also controls Afilias and pays off the other 18 registrars in the consortium to allow them to mess up .info to keep competition away from .com in the present and future (so new gtld's will Not be added again). And they have succeeded in this. If you don't believe this, then answer why almost half of the best .info names are still locked after almost 4 years? If you owned the .info registry, wouldn't you want to have these names in use so you could promote .info and sell more registrations? It is time for .info to be taken away from Afilias immmediately without urther delay.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 6 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com