| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Why is Dotster silent about the Panix hijack?
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 3 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Better still, Dotster followed up on the incident by spamming past (and, I assume, present) customers—including those at Panix—with PR about their domain-locking service.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
|
|
 |
...and it gets at the heart of what is wrong with the transfer dispute policy.
The problem with the transfer dispute policy is that it practically requires a registrar to admit they did something wrong. American businesses operate according to the principle that to admit error is to accept liability. Nobody does that.
If the transfer dispute policy were accessible to registrants, instead of registrars, the transfer policy would make a whole lot more sense.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|