ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    ICANN Staff and Structure Easier to contact Mars than ICANN
    posted by michael on Tuesday September 21 2004, @06:46AM

    Richard_Henderson writes "In an interview this week with BBC's 'Click Online', Vint Cerf describes his vision of an interplanetary internet, and outlines the difficulties in communicating with Mars.

    If a 'Mars rover' was heading towards a cliff, in the 20 minutes it would take to perceive the problem, and the 20 minutes needed to respond, the vehicle would have plummeted to destruction.

    In contrast, I have waited over two years for a reply from ICANN."

    862 days ago I foresaw the danger of the .info Landrush 2 being abused by registrars who could exploit their position to submit exclusive short lists in order to secure the best domain names available. This had already happened in the .biz2B, so I sent Dan Halloran and the ICANN Board a list of concerns and examples of serious abuse of the ICANN processes.

    862 days later, I have never received any acknowledgement of my mail, and 'the rover has driven over the cliff'... in other words, the same abuses were repeated in the .info Landrush 2 as had already occurred in .biz2B.



    "Two weeks ago, the Evaluation report on the New gTLDs by Miriam Sapiro confirmed the concerns over the Round Robin process and its susceptibility to abuse (on pages 80 and 142 of her report), suggesting fairer methods of name distribution than the exploitable Round Robin process.

    The problems "highlight the need for a broader discussion within the ICANN community of the advantages and disadvantages of the various allocation options".

    But how can people seriously engage with ICANN when the line "has gone dead"... when ICANN consciously chooses to evade your comments?

    Ms Sapiro also called into question (as I did) the efficacy of the Sunrise provisions, which had seen 43% of all .info Sunrise registrations shown to be false, and which the Afilias Director Bob Connelly called at the time "an abomination".

    Throughout this period (which was billed as a 'proof of concept')ICANN ignored fair and reasonable concerns and warnings...

    It may take 20 minutes for Mr Cerf to respond to a warning from Mars... it has taken 862 days for ICANN to respond to my warnings (finally acknowledged by Ms Sapiro) about abuse of the ICANN processes... or rather, NOT to respond.

    I sent Dan Halloran my detailed concerns by e-mail on May 12th 2002.

    A copy of the letter to Dan Halloran was posted at ICANNWatch.

    I notified the GA of these concerns on 12th May as well.

    I notified GA again of these concerns on 26th May...

    and again, the next day.

    I asked again on 29th May.

    I posted a further request, which was also sent direct to Dan Halloran.

    Further comments on Dan Halloran's silence on 29th June (also e-mailed direct to him)can be found here.

    A further polite request for answers, also CC'd directly to Dan Halloran, was publically posted on 7th July 2002.

    As I say, I had also posted the same 14 questions at ICANNWatch and on public mailing-lists.

    My mail was re-sent on 2nd September 2002.

    I later mailed Paul Twomey on 18th May 2003 to try to obtain a response - I got no reply or acknowledgement from him either (notwithstanding his public comments on the importance of responsiveness).

    Neither Dan Halloran nor Paul Twomey ever acknowledged receipt of my mail.

    Is this the openness and responsiveness we should expect from an organisation which serves the whole world?

    I believe that ICANN does not want to answer awkward questions and therefore consciously evades them. I take the view that it is irresponsible and inexcusable of ICANN to ignore serious and reasoned letters.

    Is this openness? Is this dialogue? Is this acceptable for an organisation entrusted with running a world resource? My questions raised fair concerns. My questions were serious and not flippant. I have patiently asked, again and again, for a response.

    Now .info LR2 has come and gone, and exactly the same "exclusive" lists have gamed the system as they did in.biz2B, as I warned Dan Halloran. He did nothing. He didn't answer.

    As you can see, I've tried, but ICANN just didn't want to answer.

    Conclusion: It's far easier to communicate with Mars than with ICANN. 862 days is too long to wait for a response. I can only conclude that ICANN has ceased to exist as an open and transparent, communicative and responsive life form. Vint Cerf's vision for the planets is grandiose and - who knows - visionary? But here on Earth, ICANN is like a remote rover, out of control, and out of touch, careering from one disaster to another.

    Richard Henderson"

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · Dr. Paul Twomey
    · Vinton G. Cerf
    · Afilias
    · Daniel E. Halloran
    · ICANN
    · Evaluation report on the New gTLDs
    · ICANNWatch
    · notified the GA
    · again
    · the next day
    · asked again
    · a further request
    · here
    · request for answers
    · Richard_Henderson
    · interview
    · More ICANN Staff and Structure stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Easier to contact Mars than ICANN | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Out of orbit
    by Anonymous on Tuesday September 21 2004, @07:59AM (#14188)
    Mr. Henderson, It would appear you have gotten an answer but not a reply.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 5 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com