ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) Using the UDRP, when a registrar owns the domain
    posted by michael on Monday July 12 2004, @02:09PM

    Nagle writes "Some registrars trade in domain names, either directly or using affiliates. We have a domain dispute in such a case. The registrar involved has registered the domain with the NSI registry, but has provided no "whois" info at all in their own registry. The registrar then routed the domain to "pool.com", an affiliate which is supposedly auctioning it off. The registrar tells us that at the conclusion of the auction, the whois information will be updated with the identity of the winner of the auction.

    The UDRP form requires waiving any claims against the "registrar", contemplating that the registrar is a neutral party in a domain dispute. But when a registrar apparently owns names for its own account, is it possible to still use the UDRP?

    We have a registered US trademark identical to the domain name in dispute, so we could win either a UDRP proceeding or an Anti-Cybersquatting Act case. This is open and shut. But we're not yet sure who to proceed against.

    Has this ever come up before?"


     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · UDRP
    · More Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Using the UDRP, when a registrar owns the domain | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 11 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Generic?
    by GeorgeK on Monday July 12 2004, @03:59PM (#13933)
    User #3191 Info | http://www.kirikos.com/
    If the domain in question is generic, even if you have a trademark in one category, it would not prevent others from legitimately using that domain in commerce for other products. Apple Computer has a registered trademark on "apple", but if Apple.com expired and got deleted, I wouldn't hesitate to try to register it, to sell apples. :)

    Since the name just dropped, presumably (I guess you won't tell us the domain name?), you should know soon who the new registrant is....
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Slander
    by Anonymous on Tuesday July 13 2004, @04:11AM (#13934)
    I hope you'll be sued for slander if you accuse anyone or any company of cybersquatting if in fact there is no cybersquatting.

    Slander is stating someone committed a crime when they haven't committed a crime.

    And just because someone owns your trademark in an extension and offers that domain name for sale doesn't necessarily mean they've cybersquatted.
     
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • Re:Slander by wipowatch Tuesday July 13 2004, @06:00AM
    You Don't Understand Pool.com
    by jberryhill on Tuesday July 13 2004, @08:40PM (#13950)
    User #3013 Info

    You don't understand how Pool.com operates. They, and their registrar network, target expiring domain names based on expressions of interest from a "pool" of customers. If the Pool network is successful in registering the domain name, it is assigned to the winner of an auction among those customers who initially wanted to register the domain name. Pool is not registering domain names for "itself" - it is indeed registering domain names in response to requests received from prospective registrants. The problem is that you are so gung-ho to go after the domain name (which you failed to pick up via Snapnames), that you aren't waiting to find out who it is that wins the assignment process.

    The presence of this question on Icannwatch underscores the growing disconnect between people who knew "how things worked" four or five years ago, and people who know how they work today.

    Pay attention. The ball moves.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com