ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Security SSAC releases Sitefinder report
    posted by michael on Saturday July 10 2004, @09:34AM

    GeorgeK writes "As reported in the Washington Post, ICANN's SSAC has released their Wildcard report which pans the Sitefinder offering."



    "This is a good thing, and no surprise given how much the service was resoundingly loathed by the Internet community, save for a few VeriSign shills."

    [Editor's note: For a rather different view, see Karl Auerbach's comments.

    My own first impression is less negative than Karl's. I see the report as an excellent statement of the IETF orthodoxy. It gives due regard to the fact that Sitefinder did not in fact violate any of the RFC's, which are ambiguous on key points, and that wildcarding works well in different settings -- which the report does not say must be abolished. It even makes a coherent and sensible distinction between the large, mass wildcarding of .com and the small targeted wildcarding of .museum]. And it leans heavily on the harmful nature of suprise changes in the deployment of basic protocols on which so many applications rely -- even if those changes are within the letter of the rules. Those all seem to me like really good things to say.

    So, within its own terms of reference, the report seems a model of its kind.

    The deep question, though, is the one posed by Karl in his comment noted above: are the terms of reference the authors set for themselves the right ones, or is the IETF creating an ossified orthodoxy like that of the Bell system? Is it better to engineer for very small incremental change, internal revolution, or just wait for the next disruptive technology to come along? -mf]

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · IETF
    · VeriSign/NSI
    · ICANN
    · resoundingly loathed
    · Karl Auerbach's comments
    · GeorgeK
    · reported
    · Wildcard report
    · More Security stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    SSAC releases Sitefinder report | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 8 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Report misses the point: Verisign hijacked names
    by odonnell (michael_odonnell@acm.org) on Sunday July 11 2004, @12:41AM (#13914)
    User #3447 Info | http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~odonnell/
    I think the report misses the main point of the SiteFinder exercise. The main point has nothing to do with network architecture nor with wild cards, although the first is at least a secondary relevant point.

    Main point: The power to route a domain name to a chosen address is a valuable power. Verisign's whole DNS business is lucrative because it has been made co-steward in the assignment of that power. Any other corporation or individual must pay and sometimes defend legally in order to determine the resolution of a particular domain name. Verisign has a perfect right to route domain names to SiteFinder as long as it pays the same price. I'm even willing to consider a bulk discount, if similar discount is available publicly. Absent such a payment, Verisign was hijacking all of the otherwise unassigned domain names.

    Perhaps the fallacy of the ICANN report is clearest when it refers to "nonexistent" domain names. All names exist. Some resolve to addresses, some don't. The power to make one resolve to a particular address is a valuable power, with a commercial value.

    Mike O'Donnell
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com