| At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
I can't quite decide whether to put this in the "ICANN Does Good" category or not. First, did "ICANN" do it? Is ICANN responsible for the actions of the somewhat independent ALAC? Or is the ALAC's delegate better seen as an example of powerless tokenism, one of a handful of votes likely to be drowned out in a large nomcom structurally dominated by insider and corporate interests?
Second, is this "good"? Well in one sense obviously yes; in another less obviously so. Alan Davidson is one of my favorite people to talk to about Internet issues. Smart. Real smart. Heart undoubtedly in the right place. Someone who can talk to the suits and the insiders without scaring them. In some ways a brilliant appointment. But CDT as an organization is resolutely moderate, devoted to a baby-splitting agenda on ICANN issues that has meant never never drawing a line in the sand--and thus having much sand kicked in its face. Its funding and thus consistent presence lead to it being treated as more representative of the ICANN civil liberties community than I think it was...and to a sense of betrayal and puzzlement among the ICANN insiders when a deal CDT signed on to was greeted with howls of complaint by other commentators and ICANN participants who focused on user issues and civil rights.
But even CDT wasn't able to make much headway against the ICANN insiders' coup. So, a couple of years ago, CDT seemed to give up on ICANN. But rather than admit ICANN was a lost cause, CDT just changed its priorities. It just mostly walked away, but quietly, not wanting to burn bridges. This appointment may demonstrate the value of decorous behavior, and I'm sure Alan Davidson will make the right arguments as well as they can be made. But when these arguments lose on votes, it also means that CDT's approach will be softly, softly. And look where that's gotten us so far...
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
[ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]
|
|
| |
|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
Alan Davidson to NomCom
|
Log in/Create an Account
| Top
| 2 comments
|
Search Discussion
|
|
The Fine Print:
The following comments are owned by whoever posted them.
We are not responsible for them in any way.
|
|
 |
Anyone can make a difference within the NomCom. As long as the member knows what he wants and is willing (and able) to say so. The NomCom strives after unanimity. So this means you can get something. Not all, but something. Believe me. I was there.
|
|
|
[ Reply to This | Parent
]
|
| 1 reply beneath your current threshold. |

Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their
respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com
|