ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Lawsuits and Judicial Decisions Register.com, Dotster, Join the DNS Patent Follies
    posted by michael on Wednesday June 02 2004, @12:18PM

    jberryhill writes "There are two entries this week in the race to pile up DNS-relevant patents. Joining notables such as the Sitefinder Patent, The Multi-TLD Menu Patent, the two pending WLS patents, and the Namespinner Patent, come a pair of miserable flops from Register.com and Dotster."



    "U.S. Patent No. 6,745,248, which issued on June 1, 2004 to Register.com provides a classic illustration of what can go wrong when your patent attorney does not understand your invention. The patent, entitled "Method and Apparatus for Analyzing Domain Name Registrations" purports to provide a method by which one can search a TLD zone file for domain names that are similar to an input search string. Well, that's one of the things which it was apparently supposed to describe. The problem is that the person who wrote it does not understand the difference between a root zone file and a TLD zone file. Compounding the irritating reference to "root servers" is the pretty amazing inference that one can determine either a registrar or a domain name registrant from zone file data, let alone root zone file data.

    Claim 1 is hopeless:

    1. A method of identifying at least one domain name and determining at least one domain name server corresponding to the at least one domain name, the method comprising:

    downloading a root zone file, the downloaded root zone file comprising an authoritative list of domain names, the downloaded root zone file associating each domain name with a registrar and at least one domain name server;

    establishing a search characteristic and performing a string search in the downloaded root zone file;

    identifying in the downloaded root zone file one or more domain names matching the search characteristic and, for each matching domain name, a corresponding registrar and a corresponding domain name server; and

    storing each matching domain name in a data file, the data file associating each matching domain name with the corresponding registrar and the corresponding domain name server.

    Five inventors listed, and you would think that at least one of them would have mentioned that the root zone file merely contains TLD's and their associated nameservers. Of course, the TLD zone file doesn't list the registrars either, so it is pretty much anybody's guess what it was that the drafter managed to so profoundly garble well beyond the limits of intelligibility, or 35 U.S.C. 112 for that matter. Maybe they meant the registry whois database, but that still doesn't net you a list of domains registered to a single entity, which the patent purports to describe (but fails to claim anyway).

    The real punchline to the Register.com waste of money is that they filed the application the same week they sued Verio for, ummm, mining whois data (which is what the patent more appropriately should have described for its intended purpose). Cute trick, eh?

    The Dotster entry in the patent sweepstakes is U.S. Appl. No. 10/295198 entitled "Automatic Domain Name Status Monitor. This is another dropcatching, or expired-name re-registration, system along the lines of the Bayles/SnapNames/Verisign WLS Patents mentioned above.

    Claim 1:

    1. A method for notifying a user of the availability of domain names, the method comprising:

    monitoring a domain name search performed by a user;

    creating a user-specific domain name database including at least one domain name searched for by the user during the domain name search;

    automatically performing periodic checks to determine whether a domain name in the database is available for registration;

    and notifying the user that the domain name is available.
    The filing date here is November 14, 2002, which is hopelessly late in the dropcatching art. For example, the Archive.org Wayback Machine record for Snapnames circa September 25, 2001 is rock-solid 35 USC 102(b) prior art, as are other programs that were already available before then (such as Russ Smith's whois monitoring program). For all the good such a notification would do, they might as well add the step of "buying the domain name from Mike Mann" since Buydomains would register it long before anyone would respond to a "notification".

    Note to George DeCarlo: ask your patent attorney about 37 CFR 1.56 mentioned in the fine print of the Declaration you signed."

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · Register.com
    · ICANNWatch.org
    · VeriSign/NSI
    · The Register (UK)
    · U.S. Patent No. 6,745,248
    · they sued Verio
    · U.S. Appl. No. 10/295198
    · 37 CFR 1.56
    · Sitefinder Patent
    · The Multi-TLD Menu Patent
    · WLS patents
    · Namespinner Patent
    · More Lawsuits and Judicial Decisions stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Register.com, Dotster, Join the DNS Patent Follies | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com