ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) IANA
    .ly Mess: The Wages of Obsessive Secrecy
    posted by michael on Friday April 16 2004, @11:45AM

    In Dr Hosni Tayeb and the case of the disappearing Internet, The Register's Kieren McCarthy sheds as much light as there seems to be to shed on the murky, murky situation surrounding the vanishing .ly domain.

    After recounting what he was able to find out -- it reads like about half a spy story, with the good bits missing -- Mr. McCarthy persuasively concludes that the .ly affair is due in part to the behavior of the managers and would-be managers of .ly, and in part ot IANA's secretive ways"

    So where do we stand? It's impossible to tell. Dr Tayeb appears to have a legitimate claim to the Libyan domain but the organisation in charge - IANA - is known to be talking to another party. However, IANA refused to change the .ly nameservers for that company because of the Catch-22 situation that it is not registered as the official owner - the official owner being a company that no longer exists.

    Mr Luheshi is refusing to answer questions left on his phone and sent through email. Dr Tayeb has equally not responded to emails and his phone contact numbers do not work. Meanwhile, ICANN and IANA refuse to disclose any details of the redelegation or even if they are willing to step in to end the impasse.

    In short, it is a complete mess and should raise some very serious questions over how authority in the Internet's infrastructure is decided. It is also, again, a damning indictment against ICANN culture of secrecy which has meant that no one - not even those that are claiming ownership of the domain - know what is going on.

    Should a squabble between owners lead to an entire country's Internet presence disappearing? Clearly not. And once the problem has finally been resolved, ICANN would do well to make space at its next meeting to discuss what lessons can be learnt from this whole sorry saga.

    I'd say, begin by officially docketing every redelegation request, noting date and source. What possible harm could this do?


     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · IANA
    · The Register (UK)
    · ICANN
    · Dr Hosni Tayeb and the case of the disappearing Internet
    · More Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .ly Mess: The Wages of Obsessive Secrecy | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 9 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    ICANN lacks objective processes and criteria
    by KarlAuerbach on Friday April 16 2004, @04:22PM (#13400)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    As far as I could tell during the time I was on ICANN's board ICANN had no objective process, no objective procedures, and no objective criteria to deal with ccTLD redelegations. Rather, it appeared to be highly subjective and seemingly based on personal contacts made by ICANN's travel-loving "staff".

    ICANN - or is it IANA? - which is a private California Corporation, is standing in loco parentis over ccTLD matters that seem to most observers to have some relationship to national sovereigns.

    Except of course for the United States, which simply walked around ICANN - or is it IANA? - with regard to the redelegation of .us.

    These redelegation decisions amount to e-recognition of sovereign countries. That's not something that ICANN is equipped to do.

    Nor is the US Department of Commerce, from whom ICANN has the purchase order to perform "the IANA function" an appropriate body to engage in e-recognition of countries. That job in the US more appropriately belongs to the US Department of State - and ICANN has no contract with that body.

    ICANN's gobbledygook language about how ccTLDs are to be run for the interest of local communitys is nothing but a NewSpeak phrase that says that ICANN - or is it IANA? - gets to say who on the internet gets to be a country.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com