Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Registrars Questioning Innovation with Bob Parsons
    posted by michael on Thursday March 04 2004, @08:01PM

    AF writes "As a follow up to the previous discussion here about Go Daddy's $100,000 pledge to ICANN, this CircleID interview with Bob Parsons, president of the Go Daddy may be of interest.

    CircleID Question:

    Last year, Go Daddy was one of the registrars that sued ICANN in order to block VeriSign's Wait Listing Service (WLS). Today you are supporting ICANN, not only verbally, but also financially. Is this the case of a strategic move to support the better of the two evils or does Go Daddy genuinely believe that ICANN is reforming and indeed headed in the right direction?"

    "Bob's Response:
    That lawsuit has been dismissed. Since that time we've noted that ICANN is making a genuine effort to do its job. We do not consider ICANN an evil. We're not so sure we can say the same thing about VeriSign. All we ever wanted, and all we want now, is for ICANN to do the job it was created to do. That job is to make sure that the domain name system and the various registries operate fair and equitably. With the new administration at ICANN, they've been trying to do that job (which of course is exactly why VeriSign has filed suit against them)....
    Read the complete interview here."

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
    · ICANNWatch.org
    · VeriSign/NSI
    · CircleID
    · ICANN
    · here
    · previous discussion
    · this CircleID interview with Bob Parsons
    · More Registrars stories
    · Also by michael
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Questioning Innovation with Bob Parsons | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 24 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    That was *not* what ICANN was created to do
    by KarlAuerbach on Friday March 05 2004, @09:29AM (#13078)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    The main article makes the clam that ICANN was created: "to make sure that the domain name system and the various registries operate fair and equitably"

    That was not ICANN's purpose at all - ICANN was to provide technical coordination in order to ensure that certain aspects of the internet (such as the upper layers of DNS and IP address allocation) operated in a stable and dependable way.

    ICANN was never intended (except in the minds of a few focused business interests) as a means to impose particular business models and modes of business that favor a few selected "stakeholders" at the expense of those majority of internet users who were never permitted to be "stakeholders" at all

    The idea that ICANN has introduced "free enterprise" into the business of buying and selling names does not stand even the most mild scrutiny - ICANN has imposed a particular business model and the only free enterprise is for those who are willing to conform their practices to that model, all other business models are excluded. That's not "free enterprise" any more than were the Soviet 5 Year Plans of the 1930's.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re:.TRAVEL takes .WEB path ?
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Friday March 05 2004, @04:03PM (#13093)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    There are genuine issues with domain names longer than 3 letters -- not with the Internet infrastructure itself, but with clueless people who write programs that "validate" e-mail or Web addresses (e.g., when they're input into a registration form on a Web site or software program) and insist that they're incorrect if you try to use an address with .name, .info, etc. This would seem to call for "tech evangelism" of such developers, similar to that which the Mozilla browser developers do with clueless developers who turn away anybody using their browser.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:who broke the monopoly
    by KarlAuerbach on Friday March 05 2004, @06:18PM (#13095)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    ICANN has to a large extent preserved and entrenched the Versign dominance rather than mitigating it.

    As for registrars - they are largly nothing more than resellers. One could argue in the same vein, and with the same ultimate fultility, that lots of gasoline stations on many street corners reduces the dominance of the few oil companies.

    ICANN has institutionalized a $6 per name per year cash flow into Verisign - even though that amount bears no resemblance to actual costs, and the ICANN contract has no provisions that allow economic or other pressures to drive down that fee.

    So, to say that ICANN has "broken up" NSI or Verisign is rather a misnomer.

    In addition - what gives ICANN the authority to say who may and who may not enter the top level domain business - that kind of power is usually found in close proximity to the phrase "restraint of trade". The US Dept of Commerce, which is trying to create ever more distance between itself and ICANN, has not been forthcoming about where it finds the legal authority to confer upon ICANN the right to restrain trade.

    It takes a Procrustean kind of bending and pulling to fit ICANN's regulation of DNS business practices into the phrase "technical coordination".
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:.TRAVEL takes .WEB path ?
    by KarlAuerbach on Friday March 05 2004, @06:22PM (#13096)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    "Second hand reports"?

    I trip over javascript and php based restrictions on domain names and e-mail address on web forms all the time.

    When I was on the board I pointed out to the board several times that there is lots of deployed code out there in the net that impairs the use TLDs of more than three characters.

    So I am surprised that ICANN finds this issue to be a surprise.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re:.TRAVEL takes .WEB path ?
    by fnord (groy2kNO@SPAMyahoo.com) on Saturday March 06 2004, @06:56AM (#13097)
    User #2810 Info
    Can you (or anyone) point to some existing .travel concerns? BTW, how does one 'register' one's domain name with the USPTO? I get the new.net press releases (which show up about once every three months) so I know that StarGate has joined new.net's very slowly growing list of resellers. If it's not too much trouble could you please also show me where I can find registerfly on the ICANN accredited list [icann.org]? Otherwise I guess I (or anyone) could become xegisterfly and become the subject of new.net's next press release. -g
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com