ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) AFNIC Relaxes .fr Registration Policies
    posted by michael on Tuesday March 02 2004, @05:14AM

    philipperodhain writes "Association Française pour le Nommage Internet en Coopération (“AFNIC”), the domain name authority managing the French country code top level domain, is introducing a new regime for registration of .fr domain names.

    Among the main changes, the new regime abolishes any requirement that registrants demonstrate a 'right to the name'. Until now an applicant for registration of a .fr domain name had to prove that the domain name reflects its company name, business name or trade mark that is in force in France.

    Under the new regime it will no longer be necessary for applicants to prove that they have any rights to their domain names: applications will be considered on a 'first come, first served' basis."




    "Introduction of the new regime will be in two phases:

    - In the second quarter of 2004 it will be possible for anyone who can be identified online in French public databases (e.g. companies, businesses, associations listed in the INSEE directory, trade mark owners, etc.) to apply for registration of a .fr domain name without the need to produce supporting legal documentation

    - From the beginning of 2005, a similar provision will be extended to natural persons and to legal entities which are not identifiable from French public databases (e.g. associations not listed in the INSEE directory, etc.) provided that the person or entity has a legal presence in France

    Although it is clear that the introduction of the new regime will be greatly welcomed, it is expected that there will be an increase in conflicts between domain name registrants and trade mark owners.

    AFNIC has announced that from commencement of the new regime a procedure will be available, as an alternative to litigation, for resolution of disputes between competing parties claiming rights in a .fr domain name.

    While this alternative to litigation will be helpful, we are concerned that cybersquatters may take advantage of the liberalised regime to register available domain names that correspond to trade marks whose owners have taken no action to secure those domain names. It is therefore very important for trade mark owners to protect their trade marks at the earliest opportunity by registering their corresponding .fr domain names."

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · Afnic - .fr registry
    · philipperodhain
    · More Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    AFNIC Relaxes .fr Registration Policies | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    S'ok if the disp resolution doesn't look like UDRP
    by ldg on Tuesday March 02 2004, @10:51PM (#13058)
    User #2935 Info | http://example.com/
    It is therefore very important for trade mark owners to protect their trade marks at the earliest opportunity by registering their corresponding .fr domain names.

    And if they don't choose to register those names, they should not be able to wrest them from a registrant unles the use of the domain infringes via content (not meta tags) or is held for ransom. Ransom means a $35 domain selling for $3500 out of the box, for example. In addtion, if a domain has been in use for a year or more before a tm holder decides to try to hijack it, it should be a "no go," again, barring content infringement.

    One of the most unreasonable aspects of domain name conflicts, IMO, is the trademark holders who did not choose to register a domain and then did everything they could to take them from people who did register them, many of whom used them fairly. It then went further with tm holders going after similar names that had nothing to do with their own line of business or those who had exact names and used them for differnt lines of business (clue.com comes to mind).

    I'm glad to see .fr go to first come, first served. That's the way it was meant to be in the first place.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com