Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    .eu and Europe too .eu, still coming real soon now after all these ye
    posted by michael on Sunday February 15 2004, @11:07AM

    fnord writes "Mon Dieu! Who would have thought that some entity could move even more slowly than ICANN? The European Commission, having announced less than a month ago that .eu names would go live by November of 2004, after a sunrise period (or two) beginning in September of 2004, has now delayed the launch until "Q1 next year", according to this Register article. This has to be at least the eleventeenth delay in the process [earlier ICANNWatch coverage here].

    For example, here is Erkki Liikanen, then and now the European Commissioner responsible for Enterprise and Information Society, telling Mike Roberts, then ICANN CEO (in internet time just less than an eternity ago) that he expects .eu to go live in the year 2000. This is about as believable as a store advertising its third (or for a more exact parallel, fifth) annual going out of business sale.

    No matter. Ever optimistic, the Commission still plans [page last updated almost nine months ago] to begin accepting registrations after receiving ICANN's OK (one can imagine 'pay and obey going over like the Hindenburg with some EU member states, SFAICT none of the member ccTLDs have signed up) by the end of 2003. Given this current, perhaps overly optimistic, timeline there are, not surpisingly, no plans for 2004. Cor blimey! If this is an example of how governments operate, and want to operate the internet, I'll have to rethink my qualified support for letting the ITU have a go."

    "As the Register says:
    Early ideas for .eu date back to the mid-nineties; and launching has been said to be iminent since 2000. The idea was to have an European competitor against the-then monopoly NSI's .com-domains. At the time its seemed so tempting.

    But a quick start was out of the question, once The Commission decided to adopt a formal regulatory framework. Member states and EU parliament and its committees got involved. This is the "normal" procedure: not fast, not slow - only too slow for Internet competition. Other newcomers to the TLD market have long outrun .eu.

    Exactly. I recall Erkki Liikanen saying a few years ago that an .eu (is it a ccTLD or a gTLD or a... you decide) would provide an economic boost for member states. This is, of course, silly, unless there are numerous European companies out there stubbornly refusing to get online until they can register a *.eu. Or are we to believe that a bmw.eu site would help BMW sell more cars than bmw.com (and .net, .biz, info, and GAKK!! Dan will probably like this even less than I do, .org), bmw.de, or for that matter bmw.fr. Admittedly, BMW is everywhere so perhaps they're not the best example, this being Valentine's Day, let's take mythical ma and pa outfit myswisschocolates.ch (.ch being, non-obviously, switzerland) and put them at myswisschocolates.eu and watch their sales go through the roof.

    Worse still, despite more than ample time and examples, the European Commission doesn't seem interested in learning from ICANN's plethora of mistakes. For example, they plan to do one (or two) sunrise periods, a concept so fraught with peril that Affilias (the poster kid for this thoroughly discredited idea), is about to launch some IDN (Internationalized Domain Names) without any sunrise protection, it's first come, first served (oops, that's been delayed too, and being Affilias they can't get anything right, wrongly claiming to be first from the post with IDN).

    This is helping one sector of the economy (though not necessarily European), .eu pre-registration scams have gone through the roof. While EURid posts a prominent warning on their home page that there are no pre-registrations, a web search on Google for .eu+domain produces no shortage of pre-registration offerings, including some of Google's sponsored (that is, paid for) links.

    At time of writing the first URL in the Register article was malformed, it should be EURid. And the link at the end of the Sue 'em all section should be, approximately: the job? [warning: .doc format, reproduced in full below, complete with errors and with their emphasis]. It gives an idea of the compexities involved when herding cats. -g


    .eu Sunrise Registration - Validation Agents Sought


    EURid is seeking to engage a suitably qualified body, established within the EU to validate prior rights claims of domain name applicants during the sunrise period of the new .eu top-level domain

    EURid has been selected by the European Commission to operate .eu top-level domain registry.

    EURid has been established as a not-for-profit organisation in Belgium and registry services will be charged on a cost recovery basis. The EURid registration model is a highly automated system and based upon the principle of first-come-first-served. The system has been adapted from the model of the Belgian registry.

    The legal framework which enabled creation of the .eu TLD Regulation (EC) No. 733/2002 on the implementation of the .eu TLD, stipulates that provision must be made for a ‘sunrise period’ to enable those with prior rights to a name to register in advance of general registrations commencing.

    The EC, in consultation with the Member States, has still to determine Public Policy Rules for .eu and this will include policy in prior rights and validation. The PPR are expected during March 2004.

    The Regulation has already determined that only those businesses established in the EU or having their registered office (or principal place of business within the community) and natural persons who are resident in the EU will qualify to register a .eu domain name.

    The Regulation also gives the following information on who will have the opportunity to register during the sunrise period.

    “Public policy shall include:

    public policy on speculative and abusive registration of domain names including the possibility of registrations of domain names in a phased manner to ensure appropriate temporary opportunities for the holders of prior rights recognised or established by national and/or Community law and for public bodies to register their names;”

    Public Policy Rules

    The PPR have yet to be finalised and adopted but will contain rules and procedures for phased registration.

    Sunrise Provision

    Though still to be adopted, we understand that the PPR will provide for a two-phase sunrise period, each phase lasting for 2 months. During phase one holders of registered (possibly published) trademarks and public bodies will be able to register their domain names. During phase two holders of other rights will also be able to apply. There is no definitive list of rights recognised but the PPR may include examples such as unregistered trademarks, company names family names. Such rights must be recognised under Community law or in the member state in which the applicant is established.

    Applications for domain names will be made only through accredited registrars who will have access to EURid automated systems. Applications made during sunrise will include extra information such as the type of right the applicant has to the name and under which law. Applications will be date/time stamped, stored in a special sunrise database and the names requested will be blocked from registration until a conclusion is reached on whether there is a prior right claim to that name or not. A whois lookup facility will be publicly available to show all applicants for a name, the order in which they were received, the right claimed and the deadline for each applicant to submit paperwork proving the right.

    The registrant will then have 40 days from making the application to provide the required documentary evidence of prior rights to a Validation Agent (VA) to be engaged by EURid. The responsibility will rest with the applicant to ensure his paperwork has reached the VA by the 40th day. This can be monitored by using the whois look-up facility. Once the deadline has passed, the application expires and the named becomes available for general registration. If there is more than one application for that name, first-come-first served principle applies. Only when the earliest applicant has failed to produce suitable documentation within the 40 days will the paperwork of subsequent applications be checked. If no applicant provides satisfactory evidence of prior rights within the 40 period they are given, the name will be ‘unblocked’ and made available for general registration.

    Sunrise application charges

    At the time of submitting an application during the sunrise period, a one-off sunrise application fee will be deducted from the account of the registrar. This will include the registries administrative costs and the fee to be paid to the Validation Agency.

    This charge will be non-refundable. If the prior rights are validated and the domain name accepted, the name will be registered in accordance with the information supplied in the application and the usual registration deducted from the account of the registrar.

    Public Awareness

    EURid will widely announce the sunrise period to ensure that the timescales, rules and procedures are well known throughout the EU with specific targeting to the IP and registrar communities

    Summary of Service Required from Validation Agent

    It is proposed that a suitable organisation Validation Agent be engaged to authenticate prior rights claims. The VA will have access to the sunrise application data base and be responsible for receiving and checking the documentary evidence of prior rights applicants and inputting and updating the status field of applications in EURid’s sunrise database.

    The VA will need relevant expertise regarding which rights are recognised in each of the 25 countries of the expanded EU. They will also need to know what constitutes proof of that right in the jurisdiction in which it is recognised. The VA will need to be able to draw upon expert knowledge in all of the Member states of the EU.

    The VA will have secure, web-based access to the EURid Sunrise database. Each employee will have a user ID and password. They will also have access to the public whois lookup facility, also web-based.

    The VA will be expected to handle all enquiries relating the sunrise application process and suitable contact information (including email, fax and telephone) will be widely publicised by EURid.

    As names applied for under the sunrise provision will be blocked from registration until the validation process for that name is concluded, it is not essential that validation be complete before the commencement of general registration. However, service standards will be required and these will form part of contractual negotiations between EURid and the organisation selected to provide Validation services. Priority of validation must be given to those applications received during phase one of the sunrise period. Special procedures will be made to validate the applications from governments and public bodies.

    The EURid systems will generate a daily work sheet of those applications which are the first in line to be validated and for which paper work has been received. Applications which pass their deadline and those will arrived after the first for that name has been validated will automatically be ‘rejected’ by the system and the applicants informed.

    It should be anticipated that some applications or paper work for validation will be received without an application number or which have not been requested electronically in the correct manner via an accredited registrar.

    The VA will need to demonstrate its financial stability and provide evidence of liability insurance which indemnifies EURid for errors or omissions of the VA.

    Sunrise Disputes

    An Alternative Dispute Resolution facility will be available to handle any disputes between those who are successful in registering a name and a third party challenging that right. The sunrise terms and conditions will require the registrant to participation in the ADR process. This will not prevent access to the courts.

    The VA will need to have in place procedures to investigate claims by applicants that they have made an error or failed to follow the rules of the sunrise period.

    Fees for Validation Services

    A fee will be paid for each application generated in the Sunrise database (the validation fee). The PPR provide for charging differing fees for those applications made in phase 1, which should be more straightforward to validate, and those applied for during the second phase which could be more complex and specific to one particular member state.

    Fees will be paid to the Validation Agency at the end of each month as set out below:

    The first 50% of the validation fee for all applications received in that month. The second 50% of the validation fee for each application which fails to meet the criteria or passes the deadline for receipt of documents and is rejected during that month.
    The second 50% of the agreed validation fee for each application, which is validated, plus the second 50% for later applications for the same name which then become automatically rejected.

    The levels of fee are open to negotiation but the European Commission, who must approve the registries choice of Validation Agent, will expect it to be reasonable and cost-related.

    Those interested in providing this service

    If you are interested to provide this service or would like further information, please contact us at info@eurid.org."

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
    · ITU
    · ICANNWatch.org
    · Mike Roberts: An Appreciation
    · European Union
    · The Register (UK)
    · ICANN
    · bmw.com
    · bmw.de
    · bmw.fr
    · launch
    · delayed
    · scams
    · .eu+domain
    · EURid
    · the job?
    · info@eurid.org
    · fnord
    · announced
    · this
    · here
    · here
    · plans
    · pay and obey
    · Hindenburg
    · go
    · More .eu and Europe too stories
    · Also by michael
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .eu, still coming real soon now after all these ye | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    The end of .uk, .fr, .de, ... etc?
    by KarlAuerbach on Sunday February 15 2004, @02:02PM (#12981)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    It would seem only fair that in trade for .eu that the EU member states would be obligated to give up their individual ccTLDs.

    An alternative way to preserve fairness would be to permit ccTLDs to states of the US, provinces of Canada, and other divisions of larger political structures that have a degree of their own sovereigny.

    Should there be ccTLDs for "NAFTA" and "NATO" too?

    ICANN does the job of recognizing ccTLDs via its role as provider of IANA services. Those services are performed under a contract with the United States Atmospheric and Oceanic Administration (!) [which is a sub-agency of the of the US Dept of Commerce]. Last time I looked, the US Dept of Commerce had no authority or power to recognize foreign nations; that function is usually part of the United States Department of State.

    So tell me again, exactly how does ICANN get the authority to recognize .eu?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: .eu, still coming real soon
    by fnord (reversethis-{moc.oohay} {ta} {k2yorg}) on Sunday February 15 2004, @05:34PM (#12982)
    User #2810 Info
    Ne blâmez pas Michael, I wrote the article, he just passed it on. You're quite right, they do claim [eifonline.org] to be having a dotEU launch party this May. I am reminded of the SillyConValley dotcom about the time the market crashed that closed its doors soon after opening and still went ahead with its launch party that evening. I guess we'll see.

    With regard to Karl's question, I dealt with that here [icannwatch.org] almost two years ago, which isn't to say I understand what passes for IANA/ICANN logic. -g

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com