ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Lawsuits and Judicial Decisions NSI, Register.com Sued For Patent Infringement
    posted by michael on Tuesday January 13 2004, @09:47AM

    jberryhill writes "According to a press release put out by the inventors, a lawsuit has been filed in Los Angeles against NSI and Register.com. As predicted in previous Icannwatch articles, a number of folks were filing patent applications in the late 1990's, and those applications have begun to grow up into patents.

    U.S. Patent No. 6,671,714, entitled "Method, apparatus and business system for online communications with online and offline recipients" issued on December 30, 2003. The inventors, Frank Weyer and Troy Javaher, had previously been involved in the management of the .md top-level domain name, and in everymd.com, which markets domain names to doctors. The application was filed November 23, 1999, which makes the "critical date" for prior art under 35 U.S.C. 102(b) November 23, 1998. Hence in the ensuing discussion of "everyone does that", please stay focused on things before that date."



    "The patent contains only two claims, and only one independent claim, which is quite readable:

    1. A method for assigning URL's and e-mail addresses to members of a group comprising the steps of:

    assigning each member of said group a URL of the form "name.subdomain.domain"; and

    assigning each member of said group an e-mail address of the form "name@subdomain.domain;"

    wherein the "name" portion of said URL and said e-mail address is the same and unique for each particular one of said members such that an only difference between said URL and said e-mail address for said member is that in said URL the "@" symbol of the e-mail address is replaced with a "." and wherein said "subdomain" portion of said URL and said e-mail address is the same for all members of said group.

    The second claim adds the limitation that the "members" are licensed professionals. It is not known at this time whether continuing applications of any kind were filed, which would leave one or more shoes remaining to drop.

    Interestingly, services such as demon.co.uk were offering a combination email and URL deal in the late 1990's, and the "freeyellow" service is noted on the front page of the patent as having been considered. Without a review of the file history, it may or may not be the case that the applicants relied upon the "members of a group" limitation recited in claim 1. If that is the case, then someone is going to have to take a close look at a service which was provided as early as February 1995 to certain Anglican and Episcopal organizations by the Society of Archbishop Justus at Anglican.org, and operated, now as then, by the current director of operations for Google, Dr. Brian K. Reid, a formidable entrant in any "battle of the experts" one would care to wage."

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · Register.com
    · Dr. Brian K. Reid,
    · press release put out by the inventors
    · U.S. Patent No. 6,671,714, entitled "Method, apparatus and business system for online communications with online and offline recipients"
    · More Lawsuits and Judicial Decisions stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    NSI, Register.com Sued For Patent Infringement | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 8 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Prior Art?
    by cambler (chris@ambler.net) on Tuesday January 13 2004, @12:43PM (#12837)
    User #36 Info | http://onthenet.ambler.net/
    Indeed. I have prior art dating back to 24 December, 1996 (provable), and back to mid-1995, but without proof.

    Sigh.

    --
    Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com