ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Laugh (or Cry) WIPO Poobah Uses T-word
    posted by tbyfield on Thursday December 04 2003, @07:53AM

    Kamil Idris, director-general of WIPO -- an organization to which ICANN's prostrations have made a mockery of Jon Postel's principle of deference to existing, neutral authoritative sources -- has hopped on the "terrorist" bandwagon. "Piracy," he says, "is like terrorism today and it exists everywhere and it is a very dangerous phenomenon." He went on: "Combating piracy is not an easy task, but it requires efforts of governments and international organisations and of course the NGO (non-governmental organisation) community." Examples of the "combat" he cited reportedly included copyright on songs. Can domain names be far off?



    Me, I'm inclined to laugh at the prospect. Domain names? Terrorist?! Right! But we've seen the nascent tendency of IPR *crats to "link" -- both in rhetoric and in reality -- unauthorized duplication of CDs with Terror. And we've certainly seen ample evidence of IPR *crats' transcendant love of FUD (for decades now: "Home taping is killing the music industry").

    And, in the wake of 9/11, we saw how eagerly ICANN embraced Terror as a pretext to take its problem of public accountability out behind the barn and shoot it -- then replace it with a Stepford mandate of "security and stability" (two terms that, with extortionate sublety, are all but oozing the implications of their negation).

    The point isn't what I think is likely, or even possible; rather, it's the ludicrous extremes that IPR *crats will go to in order to pimp their pet agencies. Yes, bogus pharmaceuticals are a Very Bad Thing. No, unauthorized duplication of CDs isn't the Same Thing. Yes, WIPO's chief has lumped them together. Just how likely is it that, if WIPO persists with this vaguery, ICANN will resist?

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · ICANN
    · rhetoric
    · reality
    · embraced
    · its problem of public accountability
    · Stepford
    · ludicrous extremes
    · hopped on the "terrorist" bandwagon
    · More Laugh (or Cry) stories
    · Also by tbyfield
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    WIPO Poobah Uses T-word | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    WIPO's efforts are counterproductive
    by KarlAuerbach on Thursday December 04 2003, @12:18PM (#12714)
    User #3243 Info | http://www.cavebear.com/
    ICANN has been so distracted by trying to jump through the intellectual property owners' hoops that no real attention has been paid by ICANN to protecting against "T".

    In addition, WIPO's claims are so outrageous that they have obscured the fact that there is a nugget of legitimate concern. Had WIPO been more willing to concede that trademarks do not cover names that are not used in commerce, had WIPO been willing to remember that there is a concept of fair use, and had WIPO been willing to admit that copyrights exist for the purpose of promoting future creation and that they exist only for a limited period of time, then perhaps WIPO would have found a more sympathetic reception.

    One could describe WIPO as seeking to undermine the concept of limited protection of copyrights and substitute a jihad against anyone who copies anything, no matter the reason and no matter the circumstances. In a sense isn't what WIPO is doing in itself a form of "T" against established legal norm and cultural values?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com