ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) WIPO arbitrator list bias?
    posted by michael on Thursday November 06 2003, @01:17PM

    DavidP writes "A friend of mine, who works at a public interest law firm that has on occasion looked into the problem of UDRP pro-complainant bias, wrote me with the following query:
    "I have recently learned that two panelists who tended to read the UDRP strictly and tended to be sympathetic to free speech arguments -- Milton Mueller and Gervaise Davis -- have been quietly dropped from WIPO's list of approved panelists (Davis remains on NAF's list, though). have you noticed any tendency to push the "libertarian" side off the panels and increase the presence of what might be called ip traditionalists on the panels? Does anybody look at this issue systematically? I raise this question because a deliberate alteration of the policy tilt of panelists has an impact on the litigants by biasing the selection both of single panelists and "neutrals" on three member panels. it would be hard to go at this issue based on the initial selection of persons for the list of panelists (the universe from which selection might be made is so huge), but maybe it is easier to take on the whole selection process when removal of panelists is at issue."
    Michael Geist [Link corrected] actually has taken a systematic look at this, and has compiled a small table looking at the decisions made by 14 panelists (including Mueller and Davis) recently dropped from the WIPO rolls. Nothing too suspicious pops up -- that is, there doesn't seem to be any overwhelming tendency for pro-respondent panelists only to be dropped. But that's not to say that's not why Mueller and Davis were asked to leave the scene, I suppose -- anyone know anything more about this?"



    [Note from MF: One issue would be why panelists drop off the list -- how many of the other 14 withdrew voluntarily and how many were unceremoniously fired as was Mueller, who was just dropped without even a polite note warning or thanking him.]

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
    · Milton Mueller
    · UDRP
    · DavidP
    · Michael Geist
    · More Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) stories
    · Also by michael
     
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    WIPO arbitrator list bias? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 6 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Ummm...
    by jberryhill on Friday November 07 2003, @06:45AM (#12628)
    User #3013 Info

    Gerry Davis has retired from the active practice of law, as noted on his website.

    Michael Palage has become a ICANN board member, and shouldn't remain on the list (although they kept Jonathan Cohen).

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • Re:Ummm... by Mueller Friday November 07 2003, @09:07AM
    Re:Geist study
    by domainlaw on Friday November 07 2003, @06:11AM (#12627)
    User #3836 Info
    Try this site [udrpinfo.com] (though it's rather dated and the database functions don't seem to be working at the moment).
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    Re:Geist study
    by michael (froomkin@lawUNSPAM.tm) on Friday November 07 2003, @09:36AM (#12631)
    User #4 Info | http://www.discourse.net/
    I've corrected the link.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com