Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    gTLDs hoping to enter the legacy root Read This! 'ALAC Response to the Proposed sTLD RFP'
    posted by michael on Sunday August 31 2003, @07:17PM

    The ALAC may or may not be the most wonderfully constituted and legitmate body, but it has produced a very nice discussion paper on new gTLDs, entitled "ALAC Response to the Proposed sTLD RFP and Suggested Principles for New TLD Processes". If some of the arguments sound familiar, that's because they've been falling on deaf ears for years now. You can also see ICANN's announcement of the official request for comments.

    As far as I know, no one from ICANNWatch had anything to do with the production of this paper.

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • At Large Advisory Committee
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • not
  • ALAC Response to the Proposed sTLD RFP and Suggested Principles for New TLD Processes
  • ICANN's announcement of the official request for comments
  • More on gTLDs hoping to enter the legacy root
  • Also by michael
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Read This! 'ALAC Response to the Proposed sTLD RFP' | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    by RFassett on Tuesday September 02 2003, @10:13AM (#12143)
    User #3226 Info | http://www.enum.info
    From the ALAC Draft for Public Comment:

    "Restricting eligible new TLD proposals to year 2000 applicants....would be ignoring the economic development of the past three years, and would be forcing applicants to ignore the collective experience of the Internet community in the past three years...."

    This point from ALAC seems consistent to that of then president Stuart Lynn in Dec 2002:

    "...favoring the original applications is interesting, but it is likely that with the passage of time the authors of many of the original applications would wish to update them to the point that they in effect become new applications."

    http://www.icann.org/amsterdam/gtld-action-plan-to pic.htm

    The Board needs to reconcile the fact that there has been community interpretation that "new applications" would be eligible that would not "favor original applications" as published above from the ICANN web site.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    New Applications
    by cambler (chris@ambler.net) on Wednesday September 03 2003, @09:24PM (#12159)
    User #36 Info | http://onthenet.ambler.net/
    Indeed, I must agree that favoring the original applications isn't the best idea.

    But having said that, as one of the original applicants, I must insist that the remaining original applications are addressed before new ones are processed. Not to the exclusion of new ones, of course - just that ICANN needs to finish what it started, as we, the still-pending applicants were specifically told that our applications were not turned down, but were still pending the testbed.

    Many of us have been ready, not only in the 3 years since the first round, but for many years beforehand.

    ICANN needs to finish what it started, and complete the first-round process - a process, I might add, that saw each applicant pay $50,000 to be told to "wait."

    Ambler On The Net [ambler.net]

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com