ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    ENUM & VOIP Does ENUM make any sense?
    posted by Mueller on Thursday August 28 2003, @05:56PM

    The ITU has been ardently promoting the development of ENUM, most recently at a joint conference with the Asia-Pacific Telecommunity in Thailand. Many people assume that ENUM, the protocol for mapping telephone numbers to domain names provides an essential piece of the puzzle of how to converge telephony and the Internet. But Internet veteran John Klensin puts forward a characteristically contrarian view in a short paper submitted to the ITU conference in Thailand.



    Klensin argues that "From the PSTN origination side, ENUM is not needed and may be too complicated. If used inappropriately, it may even cause violations of existing recommendations, service definitions, and regulations about, e.g., maximum call connect times." He also points out that for identifying a person or function to be reached, "the E.164-like number is less desirable than using the proposed recipient's name and other identifying information to access an appropriate directory database."

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • ITU
  • joint conference with the Asia-Pacific Telecommunity in Thailand.
  • short paper
  • More on ENUM
  • Also by Mueller
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Does ENUM make any sense? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 3 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    ITU-T and ENUM
    by rhill on Thursday August 28 2003, @11:49PM (#12139)
    User #3320 Info | http://www.itu.int/ITU-T/
    The ITU-T has certainly been active in disseminating information on ENUM, but I don't think that it would be fair to say that the ITU, as an entity, has been "promoting" ENUM or any other particular technology. Some ITU-T members may have been promoting ENUM, but those are the activities of the members, not the institution as a whole.

    ITU-T has also, at the request of its membership, taken measures to facilitate implementation of ENUM, as can be seen from the presentations made at the joint APT-ITU workshop.

    Both Rudolph Brandner and John Klensin were invited by APT and ITU, but their views are of course personal views and do not represent a formal ITU position.

    Richard Hill
    ITU TSB
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Proprietary file formats
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Friday August 29 2003, @05:36PM (#12142)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    One pet peeve: Why do those guys have to put papers like this up in a proprietary format (MS Word) instead of a standards-based, platform-neutral format like HTML or plain ASCII text? That particular paper had no special formatting whatsoever, and hence could have been saved as a .txt file with no data loss.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com