ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Lawsuits and Judicial Decisions Micheal Zurakov Advertising for Class Members for Register.com Lawsuit
    posted by michael on Wednesday August 20 2003, @09:14AM

    Michael Zurakov, a registrant unhappy with register.com's policy of redirecting newly-registered and parked domains, is advertising for fellow plaintiffs for what he hopes will be a class action, but the web page is woefuly short on details. There's a little more information here and a lot more in this decision in what appears to be an earlier phase of the same case, Zurakov v Register.Com, Inc., 2003 NYSlipOp 13230 (April 22, 2003).



    Here's the core of the complaint as summarized by the court:
    Pursuant to an online contract, plaintiff paid defendant $35 to register the domain name "Laborzionist.org" in his name for one year and defendant did so. Not stated in the contract is the fact that a domain name newly registered with register.com forwards users to a "Coming Soon" page that contains banner advertisements for register.com and other organizations. A person who types the newly registered domain name into the Internet is brought to a page that reads, "Coming Soon! We recently registered our domain name at . . . register.com the first step on the web." There follows directly a list of so-called "Additional Services" and, further down on the page, various advertisements. Looking at the page, it appears that these services are provided by the entity - the "we" - whose domain name forwarded the user to this page, although in fact they are provided by register.com. Similarly, it appears that the advertisements for register.com and for other companies are in some way endorsed by or, at the least, associated with the entity whose domain name forwarded the user to this page. After plaintiff discovered that his newly registered domain name was pointing users to this "Coming Soon" page, he followed defendant's procedures for removing his registered domain name from the page, a process he asserts took several months.

    Plaintiff alleges that he bargained for the right to exclusive use and control of the domain name "Laborzionist.org" and that defendant, by the deception of concealing in its website and not disclosing in the agreement that it intended to use the name, deprived him of this benefit by usurping the name and using it to direct those who typed in the domain name to defendant's own site, which contained advertising for defendant and others. Thus, plaintiff claims that defendant breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing implied in every contract by "act[ing] in a manner that, although not expressly forbidden by any contractual provision, would deprive the other party of the right to receive the benefits under their agreement"

    You can also read law.com's take on the decision.

    [Corrected spelling of "Zurakov" -mf]

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • CORE
  • Register.com
  • law.com's take on the decision
  • the web page
  • here
  • this decision
  • More on Lawsuits and Judicial Decisions
  • Also by michael
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Micheal Zurakov Advertising for Class Members for Register.com Lawsuit | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 20 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    This is a really dumb lawsuit
    by jberryhill on Wednesday August 20 2003, @04:39PM (#12100)
    User #3013 Info

    Any register.com domain name registrant had, at any time, the full power to designate nameservers other than the default nameservers which are supplied by register.com for clueless newbies. At any time, each registrant had the exclusive ability to designate nameservers - they were not deprived of this ability. However, the RFC requires that there be two nameservers. I suppose that the registrants of non-functional names believe they have the right to make the rest of the DNS waste resources looking up non-existent records.

    If you want to file a suit that makes sense, then get some refunds on the .pro defensive registrations, since the legal geniuses at ICANN didn't bother to put a simple provision in the TLD contrats requiring those who were selected to actually run a registry (over others who were ready, willing, and able to do so, but were bumped out the magic 7 slots by non-performers like .pro).
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    In the good old days...
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Thursday August 21 2003, @06:33AM (#12105)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/
    Back when I first started registering domains, the system was set up so that you actually had to have a clue technically in order to complete the registration... no point-and-drool web interfaces, you had to fill in a plain-text template and e-mail it, and you had to have DNS servers set up already on your own (no providing of "default servers" if you didn't have any). And I walked ten miles through the snow, uphill both ways, to register my first domain... :)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com