ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) What's Worse Than WIPO? (Hint - they're doing .kids.us)
    posted by michael on Tuesday August 12 2003, @08:01PM

    What's worse than WIPO? That's easy: NAF. WIPO, give it its due, is showing some signs of real sanity in the broad run of its decisions, ironically after quietly firing arbitrators not thought to be 'sound' enough in their pro-trademark leanings.

    So pity the poor folks who get chucked out of .kids.us because they run afoul of the content restrictions. According to Warren's Washington Internet Daily, which doesn't appear to put much content online) their only recourse (so far) will be NAF.



    In one sense it isn't surprising: .kids.us was likely to prefer a US-based dispute provider to a Geneva-based one. Especially for matters relating to content control.

    In another way it's both shocking and interesting: The Dot Kids Implementation & Efficiency Act of 2002 (Public Law 107-317), requires "A process to provide registrants to the new domain with an opportunity for a prompt, expeditious, and impartial dispute resolution process regarding any material of the registrant excluded from the new domain."

    Sure sounds like the basis for a private right of action if, say, just hypothetically, you could show that the dispute provider was (perish the thought)...a little one-sided or even biased.

    Why does NeuStar (the .kids.us operator) subject its customers to NAF? Does it know what it's getting into by choosing NAF for content disputes? Note that NAF's contract with NeuLevel isn't exclusive, so it's possible that NeuLevel will select additional dispute providers in the futuree. Indeed for "usDRP" cases (the .us version of the UDRP), NeuLevel allows the use of either NAF or the reputable American Arbitration Association. It's also notable that the Dot Kids Implementation and Efficiency Act lacks a direct requirement of "a prompt, expeditious, and impartial dispute resolution process" for the usDRP...

    The deadline for 'sunrise' applications to .kids.us is this Friday, Aug. 15, by the way.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • Neustar
  • UDRP
  • Dot Kids Implementation & Efficiency Act of 2002
  • one-sided
  • biased
  • deadline
  • sunrise
  • sanity
  • Washington Internet Daily
  • More on Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
  • Also by michael
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    What's Worse Than WIPO? (Hint - they're doing .kids.us) | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 2 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    [OT] Published decisions
    by Rossa (r.mcmahonNO@SPAModron.org) on Wednesday August 13 2003, @01:20AM (#12040)
    User #3430 Info | http://www.odron.org/
    This is a little off-topic, but I was wondering:

    I recently read this at the UDRP provider accreditation page:

    [Applicants must provide ICANN with] "A description of how the applicant intends to publish decisions of panels in proceedings it administers and a commitment to provide ICANN with copies of all portions of decisions of panels not published." Link [icann.org]

    Anyone know anything about this? Are there unpublished decisions around - and why would ICANN envisage a system where some decisions wouldn't be published?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com