Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) New UDRP Search Tool
    posted by michael on Wednesday April 23 2003, @05:08PM

    Intellectual Property Notes reports that, "Four foundations, including The Cornell Legal Information Institute and The Markle Foundation, have created a new search engine that can locate decisions from all domain name dispute resolution providers. Currently, the search engine database holds 4,090 cases, but the developers plan to have all decided disputes accessible within a few weeks. Searches may be conducted by domain name, complainant, respondent, trademark, or panelist. Users may also specify further information, such as whether the panel determined that respondent had no rights in the disputed domain name, or whether the panel found that the purpose of registration was to disrupt the business of a competitor. Users also have the option of performing a quick search, which finds near matches if the user provides a misspelled domain name. "

    This looks like it will be a really useful tool....

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • UDRP
  • The Markle Foundation
  • Intellectual Property Notes
  • a new search engine
  • More on Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
  • Also by michael
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    New UDRP Search Tool | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    by vbertola on Thursday April 24 2003, @12:29AM (#11525)
    User #3435 Info | http://bertola.eu.org/
    Great... though the homepage of the site currently shows:

    Current Decisions
    in Database:

    ERROR /usr/local/udrp/phplib/udrp.inc at line 46 SELECT COUNT(CaseID) FROM Cases: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock' (2)

    I would suggest these people to consider publishing the home page statically every hour or so, to avoid a database hit each time the home page is loaded... and to avoid to have nice PHP errors on the home if the database goes down. (And perhaps you could disable display_errors in your php.ini)

    Apart from technicalities... I think such a database is a great idea - it will help in monitoring the general trend of UDRP decisions, and in allowing their public review.

    --vb. (Vittorio Bertola)

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Not bad, but incomplete
    by Mueller (reversethis-{ude.rys} {ta} {relleum}) on Thursday April 24 2003, @02:06PM (#11528)
    User #2901 Info | http://istweb.syr.edu/~mueller/
    Hey, it works! I just spent half an hour playing with it.

    As someone who put together a prototype for this effort I had fun checking this out, comparing it
    with the one we did.
    [syr.edu] This one has strengths and weaknesses relative to the prototype.


    I thought our user interface was much clearer, simpler and easier to navigate, but this one is much more powerful. It enables Boolean searches and wildcards under most fields (under "Advanced Search").

    It has a more extensive and law-focused way of classifying Respondent interest and bad faith

    It tells you whether the domain name was used or not (this data element seems to be incomplete, however).

    It is online rather than downloadable. This improves accessibility. but has weaknesses: slower performance and you can't get into the database and crunch numbers (mainly a concern of social scientists, I guess).


    The real key to the usefulness of any of these databases, as Ethan and his colleagues know well, is current, accurate data. New cases need to be put in quickly, and all cases should be in. But the UDRP-DB data is not complete - dates and some categorizations are missing from many cases. More important, it is not clear how their selection of cases is bounded - what cases are in there and which ones are missing? Nowhere on the web site does it tell you how many cases are in there and which ones they are (e.g., from dates xx through yy).

    What I like least is that after a search records are listed by domain names and not by case. Thus, a case that has 10 domain names in it will be listed 10 times in a hit list. We learned that users want to see case lists, not domain name lists.

    From a graphic/navigation standpoint, the hit list is ugly and confusing. For God's sake, even the online NAF database doesn't use all those silly zeros in its case numbers, why should we?
    Some case IDs are capitalized, some are not; the colors are hard to read. The hit list order is not really based on decision date, but some other date, and we don't know where it comes from.

    You can't search by defaulted cases. The summary sheet does not show the names of all the panelists.

    Regarding trademark categories, I cannot figure out how these cases were categorized. If you search for "geographic indicators," you get only 5 hits. The famous newzealand.com case doesn't pop up (but it's in there). There are nearly 50 of such cases at least. So either the data is incomplete (many cases have not been categorized yet) or worse, wrongly categorized.
    All of the cavils above can be fixed over time, but the most serious one is completeness of data. You can't use this as a research tool at all unless one of two conditions applies:

    1) All the cases are in, or 2) A known, bounded set of the cases are in. Until that happens, this must be considered Beta.

    Anyway, the people we really need to hear from are the lawyers who do UDRP cases.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    a little patience
    by Ethan on Sunday April 27 2003, @09:08AM (#11533)
    User #3418 Info
    I invite you to try this new tool but would ask that you wait until Wednesday April 30th), which was the date we were intending to make it public. Some of what Milton doesn't like now will still be an issue then but there are also some bugs and inaccuracies will have been removed by then.

    Whether you like this or not or find it useful or not, I would encourage you to think of how primitively the UDRP process uses informational tools which we now have readily available. The UDRP requires that decisions be published simply as whole files. I applaud Milton and others who have done empirical work on UDRP cases but the amount of research that has been done has been hampered by the lack of good tools to analyze cases. If there is ever version 2 of the UDRP, I would hope that the people who know something about information retrieval would have some input.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com