Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Lost Password
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)

    Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) New Domain Name Regime Introduced in in Sweden
    posted by michael on Thursday April 03 2003, @04:27AM

    philipperodhain writes "Network Information Centre Sweden AB (NIC-SE), which is the organisation that administers .se domain names, will be introducing a new regime for registration of .se domain names."

    The regime

    Under the new regime, applicants from all over the world will be able to apply for registration of a .se domain name without needing to prove that the desired domain name reflects a company or organisation name. There will no longer be preliminary examination of applications for registration of .se domain names or any restriction on the number of .se domain names registrable per applicant. It will also be possible to register geographical names as .se domain names. However, non-Swedish applicants (those without a permanent business place or address in Sweden) must provide a local contact (i.e. person or entity who is permanently resident in Sweden).

    Early submission period

    From 2 April to 9 April 2003, there will be an early submission period in which all applicants will be able to apply for pre-registration of .se domain names. Pre-registration grants for .se domain names will be allocated according to a priority system. Those applicants who have an existing tm.se domain name will be given first priority. Priority will then go to applicants who own registered trade marks in Sweden (i.e. Swedish trade marks, European Community trade marks, International registrations having legal force in Sweden) provided that the domain name applied for corresponds exactly with the trade mark.

    If there are multiple applicants for the same domain name based on registered trade mark rights, then the domain name will be allocated to the applicant with the longest standing trade mark registration.

    Applicants who have neither registered trade marks in Sweden nor .tm.se domain names will also be able to apply for pre-registration grants, but they will be the last group to be considered in the queue for priority.

    Allocation periods

    After the early submission period, there will be successive allocation periods: an allocation period for priority pre-registration grants that will be processed between 14 and 21 April 2003, followed by another allocation period for the other pre-registration grants that will start on 21 April 2003. From 28 April 2003, .se domain names will be available on a “first-come, first- served” basis.

      An alternative dispute resolution process

    The new regime also includes a mandatory dispute resolution policy known as alternative dispute resolution (ADR). The ADR is intended to provide a cheaper and quicker alternative to litigation for resolution of disputes between domain name holders and parties with competing rights in the .se domain name. The ADR may be applied retrospectively, that is, to domain names registered before 1 April 2003.

    To succeed in an ADR action it is necessary for the party (Complainant) bringing the complaint to show that:

    - the disputed domain name is identical with or may be mistaken for a trade mark, trade name, family name, artist name or the title of another party’s protected literary or artistic work, which has legal basis in Sweden;
    - the Holder of the disputed domain name has no right or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name; and
    - the disputed domain name has been registered or is being used in bad faith.

    The Holder of the disputed domain name shall be deemed to have a right or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name if it is shown that:

    - use or preparation for use of the disputed domain name has taken place in connection with the marketing of goods or services before the dispute resolution commenced;
    - it is public knowledge that the disputed domain name relates to the Holder even if it has not acquired any exclusive right to the expression that constitutes the name; or
    - the disputed domain name is not used for commercial purposes in order to mislead consumers or to harm the reputation of a distinctive trade mark or right.

    If the disputed domain name has been registered with a view to selling or transferring it, to preventing the Complainant from using its trade mark as a domain name or to disrupting its business operations, the registration and use of the disputed domain name will be regarded as having been in bad faith.

    Should the ADR decision (that will be determined and handed down by independent attorneys) find in favour of the Complainant, the disputed domain name will either be deregistered or transferred to the Complainant.

    After the ADR decision has been handed down, the losing party can lodge an appeal before the appropriate Swedish Court within fourteen (14) calendar days.


    The introduction of this new domain name regime in Sweden is similar to the liberalisation of other namespaces which has already occurred among other European Community countries (e.g. The Netherlands in March 2003 (1)) or will do so (e.g. Spain (2)).

    The ongoing liberalisation of domain name regimes in European Community countries seems to foreshadow the forthcoming implementation of a .eu namespace and the concern of national registries to avoid consequent business downturn.

    The new Swedish regime includes original elements. For the first time, applicants who have trade marks and domain names can register a domain name in priority over those who only have trade marks. In addition, the scope of the ADR is very broad; any names capable of acquiring rights in Sweden can be invoked in an ADR action. Accordingly, it can reasonably be expected that a number of disputes will arise after the end of the allocation periods.

    Copyright © 2003

    Philippe Rodhain
    Intellectual Property Lawyer
    (1) For more information on the liberalisation of .nl namespace, please see The Launch of the .nl Dispute Resolution Policy

    (2) For more information on the coming liberalisation of .es namespace, please see PLAN NACIONAL DE NOMBRES DE DOMINIO DE INTERNET BAJO ELCÓDIGO DE PAÍS CORRESPONDIENTE A ESPAÑA (“.ES”)

    This article is not intended as a substitute for legal advice. The specific facts that apply to your matter may make the outcome different from what you may have anticipated. You should consult with an attorney specialized in the issue and laws.
    No portion of this article may be copied, retransmitted, reposted, duplicated or otherwise used without the express written approval of the author other than the normal incidents of use in connection with viewing this website.

      ICANNWatch Login  


    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

      Related Links  
  • European Union
  • philipperodhain
  • More on Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs)
  • Also by michael
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    New Domain Name Regime Introduced in in Sweden | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Sunrise policies
    by vbertola on Thursday April 03 2003, @10:45PM (#11421)
    User #3435 Info | http://bertola.eu.org/
    As usual, one does not understand why trademark holders (especially since they *already* have their own reserved space under .tm.se) should have priority in getting names. There are other relevant distinctive marks (for example, personal names for individuals) that deserve to have at least the same level of priority as trademarks. (Unless you mean that the only proper usage for the World Wide Web is to sell goods.)
    --vb. (Vittorio Bertola)
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]

    Search ICANNWatch.org:

    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com