ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    ICANN Staff and Structure Paul Twomey, President and CEO
    posted by tbyfield on Wednesday March 19 2003, @06:35AM

    No surprises here: ICANN has announced via email (update: announcement here) that Paul Twomey -- corporate bio here -- "has been appointed by the Board of Directors as the new President and CEO."



    In the view of at least two ICANN Watch editors, Michael Froomkin and myself, the prospects for this appointment seem suboptimal, for the reasons Michael explained here and here. I would be delighted if Mr Twomey would prove me wrong; I imagine Michael would too.

    The near-simultaneous appointment of Tony Staley, former Federal President of the Liberal Party of Australia, as the interim occupant of the yet-to-be-created CCNSO's seat on the NomCom suggests that ICANN's reforms are taking an antipodean turn. A hint about just how much that will differ (or not) from ICANN's current mindset might be construed from Peter Dengate-Thrush's unusually sarcastic response to news of the Staley appointment:

    The board is to be congratulated. Faced with the huge diversity of opinion, geography, legal tradition, ethnicity and language that the cctlds represent, which causes we elected officials of cctld institutions so much time and trouble in establishing consensus positions on key matters, the board has been able, by a secret process, to appoint a white, middle-aged male, from a country with an Anglo-Saxon based linguistic and legal tradition closely similar to that of the US.
    Of course, the mere fact that Mr. Twomey and Mr. Staley have their common origins in Australian federal governmental affairs by no means means they're birds of a feather, and in some ways they clearly are not. Mr. Staley is a late arrival on the scene, having arrived on the board of auDA in September 2000 and subsequently been elected chairman. Mr. Twomey, on the other hand, is an old ICANN hand, having presided over the GAC, among other things. Though from my perspective his track record is worrisome, the fact that he has a track record at all is a good thing.

    Back in the day, Mr. Twomey was willing to criticize ICANN on substantive grounds. For example, at the July 2000 Yokohama meeting when ICANN's board was swatting off the prospect of public input in the form of the Membership at Large, he said (and hats off to the Berkman Center for the archives):

    There could be two paths that this organization could end up going down. One path is a path where it merges...we find ourselves in six months' time ... the organization has essentially become an international industry association where the definition of the internet community is actually the supply-side.... It is either supply-side in terms of ccTLD administrators or other TLD administrators, it's supply-side in terms of large corporates in terms of content, it's supply-side in terms of trademark holders, it's supply-side in terms of people who control the registries and [unclear]... And that ICANN becomes an international organization representing the interests [of] those it provides services to.... The alternative is that it becomes an organization firmly focused upon the needs of the users, and that it becomes a representative of a definition of the internet community which is around the user base and [defining] stability [in terms of] the user base .... The organization runs the risk of potentially becoming a de facto industry association. If it were to do so, it would need to recognize, I think, that governments [and] competition and consumer protection organizations would pay much more attention to the activities of ICANN and would begin to apply tests to ICANN around consumer protection issues and around monopoly problems.... (RealFnord, at 03:39:00)
    It will be interesting to hear how Mr. Twomey's thoughts on any number of subjects have "evolved" on the subject of ICANN as "de facto industry association" over the last few years. More proximate, though, are the questions recently raised on ICANN Watch involving fundamental issues of bylaws, accountability, his seeming interest in "leveraging" gatekeeping activities, and the interaction of his public and private roles:
    1. Why did Mr. Twomey file a bogus IP claim for "privacy.biz" when (a) "privacy" is generic, and (b) he didn't even have a common law claim to "privacy" (but only to a much longer string containing the word)?
    2. Was his company ArgoP@cific paid anything for his time as chair of GAC? Or are remarkably round figures like US$75,000 actual, documentable expenses? If the latter, is he or the company willing to make a public accounting of them? If not, why not?
    Later today, Mr. Twomey is scheduled to air his views to the press. That's fine; but some real issues surrounding ICANN have to do, as he himself said not so long ago, with users. ICANNWatch would be delighted if Mr. Twomey would agree to use the Internet to discuss these questions, since, over the last few years, it has shown a remarkable capacity for direct, interactive communication. With all due respect to hard-working journalists, given this new context, press conferences can seem a bit retrograde; one might even regard them not as opportunities to reveal through "the media" but, rather, opportunities to conceal through mediation. We strongly believe that ICANN would benefit quite a bit if he inaugurated his tenure with a candid discussion of his own and ICANN's past and future.

    Alternatively, there's no reason, aside from the "efficiencies" of bureaucratic padding, that Mr. Twomey needs to rely on ICANN's ever-expanding (and very inefficient) staff to tell him what's going on. Thus, he could, for example, participate in a listserv dedicated to "asking the president." (Too inefficient, you say? Nope. In my spare time, I co-moderate one with almost 3000 people on it; an ICANN-president list would be lucky to attract 300 -- as even ICANN's staff, which has taken to describing public interest as minimal, must surely agree.)

    Other coverage of Mr. Twomey's appointment includes News.com.au, The Age, and the Washington Post. The latter article, by the ICANN-savvy David McGuire, quotes boardmember Karl Auerbach as saying: "I find him refreshingly different and refreshingly more broad-minded than his predecessors, I definitely feel like there's going to be an improvement. It's hard for things to get much worse."

    We hope so. More than a pseudo-reform, ICANN desperately needs to be refreshed. Mr. Twomey, an accomplished political operative, is certainly capable of doing just that. Though the specific context has changed, ICANN is now more than ever poised at the brink of precisely the question Mr. Twomey posed at Yokohama: will it continue to "evolve" by fits and starts into "a de facto industry association," or will it instead reverse its course and become "an international organization representing the interests" of and "firmly focused upon the needs of the users"? The choice, now more than ever before, is his.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • Government Advisory Committee
  • Berkman Center
  • Michael Froomkin
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • ICANN
  • here
  • here
  • unusually sarcastic response
  • Berkman Center
  • RealFnord
  • ArgoP@cific
  • and very inefficient
  • one
  • News.com.au
  • The Age
  • Washington Post
  • here
  • here
  • More on ICANN Staff and Structure
  • Also by tbyfield
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Paul Twomey, President and CEO | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 3 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Welcome!
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Wednesday March 19 2003, @02:04PM (#11344)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    I believe the poet wrote, "Meet the new boss, same as the old boss."

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re:Dengate Thrush comments
    by tbyfield (reversethis-{moc.xinap} {ta} {dleifybt}) on Wednesday March 19 2003, @03:08PM (#11345)
    User #44 Info
    no, it's an anonymous coward trying to obfuscate. PDG was advocating diversity; staley assumed the position. a subtle difference, i know, for someone clearly weaned on abusing 'PC' argumentation.

    cheers,
    t
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com