ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    IANA Commerce to Re-Award IANA to ICANN Without Considering Alternatives
    posted by michael on Tuesday March 18 2003, @08:01PM

    According to a notice (quoted below) from John S. Quarterman of MIDS fame, the Center for Civic Networking (CCN) entered a bid for the IANA function, but has been officially notified by the US Department of Commerce that despite receiving his bid, and a very detailed bid from ims, and despite an expression of concern from CENTR, Commerce has decided to re-award the IANA contract to ICANN as a sole-source (non-competitive) bid.

    That the bid was rigged from the start is no surprise. That none of the outside bidders will spend the money for a challenge is a foregone conclusion. But don't despair. Something really really good has come out of this episode: it is now clear for the first time that very competent people are ready, willing and able to step in to perform the IANA function, and that they'd do it better than ICANN. If and when ICANN is broken up into its component functions a year or three from now, this moment will be seen as the turning point in undermining the argument that ICANN is essential, and that there's nothing or no one to replace it. (Questions about this decision may also figure in Congressional hearings, although no hearings are likely until after the present hostilities have passed....)

    Update: 03/19 20:51 GMT by Michael: The official purchase order is now online.



    Here's a slightly reformatted version of the notice from John S. Quarterman. The notice was submitted to a mailing list, but not published by that list's editor:

    On 28 Jan 2003, the Dept. of Commerce, by way of NOAA, posted a "notice of intent to issue a sole-source, no-cost purchase order to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330, Marina del Rey, CA 90292. The period of performance for this effort will be three years, with a six month base period, two one-year options, and one six month option. The Government will award this purchase order on April 1, 2003." [link]

    The notice also said, "Affirmative written responses must be received no later than 10-days after publication of this synopsis."

    It was not clear whether that was 10 working days or 10 calendar days, and inquiries to NOAA did not receive a conclusive answer on that point until 6 February, when the answer was 10 calendar days.

    On 6 February, on behalf of Miles Fidelman of the Center for Civic Networking (CCN), a 501(c)3 non-profit organization dedicated to putting information infrastructure to work for community economic development and civic participation, I sent NOAA a response to the pre-solicitation notice.

    Meanwhile, Carl Malamud, on behalf of the Internet Multicasting Service (IMS), a nonprofit public research corporation, sent a response to NOAA:

    http://not.invisible.net/doc_iana.pdf

    In March, CCN received a letter from NOAA that said in part,

    "after careful analysis, determined that your bid did not provide information sufficient for this office to make an affirmative decision regarding your capability."

    "you failed to adequately describe how you would perform these technical functions or how you would establish the necessary relationships to perform these tasks"

    "notice clearly stated that offerers must submit detailed technical information demonstrating their ability to meet the identified requirements... sufficient for this office to establish a bona-fide capability and that failure to do so would result in this office proceeding as planned"

    This response is somewhat puzzling, since the presolicitation notice appeared to ask for qualifications, yet the reply from NOAA seems to indicate that a detailed proposal was required.

    Malamud's IMS response seemed to me to cover all the areas requested in the pre-solitication notice.

    Nonetheless, even though NOAA received at least two responses, according to the March letter from NOAA, ICANN will be issued the purchase order as originally planned.

    Perhaps you or someone can shed light on these matters, which are somewhat mysterious to me.

    John S. Quarterman {jsq@quarterman.com}
    Peter H. Salus {peter@netpedant.com}, press contact

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • Internet Multicasting Service
  • Carl Malamud, ics Chairman
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • IANA
  • ICANN
  • link
  • http://not.invisible.net/doc_i ana.pdf
  • John S. Quarterman
  • MIDS
  • Center for Civic Networking
  • bid from ims
  • expression
  • concern
  • Michael
  • purchase order
  • More on IANA
  • Also by michael
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Commerce to Re-Award IANA to ICANN Without Considering Alternatives | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    From the IETF...
    by Anonymous on Tuesday March 18 2003, @10:25PM (#11340)
    Dateline: San Francisco

    At the IETF meeting here in San Francisco not a soul can be found who believes that ICANN is competent to perform any of the technical functions of IANA.

    There is a universal consensus here at the IETF meeting that the IANA functions should be stripped from ICANN as the result of repeatedly demonstrated incompetence.

    I wonder what claims of competence were included in ICANN's bid to NTIA, or rather NOAA? Are there any reporters out there willing to pursue a FOIA request to take a look at what ICANN submitted?

    And come to think of it - NOAA?!! Pushing the IANA contract through the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration does have a strong and foul stench of laundering.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com