ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Board of Directors Where Are the GNSO Board Seat 14 Results?
    posted by michael on Saturday March 15 2003, @07:00PM

    The GNSO Council (formerly known as the Names Council of the DNSO) has been holding its secret, members-only, election for Board Seat 14. According to the GNSO Election Procedures web page, the results for the first round of balloting should have been announced on the 13th. Second round results should have been announced on the 15th. It's the 16th today, and we don't even have the first round results yet. Update: 03/18 16:49 GMT by Michael: The "interim results" were just posted mid-day today, five days late.



    People are being quite spooky about this. Something is up.

    There were four candidates in the race (at round one):

    Of course, Barbara Simons would be the best candidate from the users' point of view, but given that the electorate is the Names Council, the heart of IP-business capture of ICANN, she doesn't have a chance.

    Incument ICANN Board Vice-Chair Alejandro Pisanty looks like the favorite candidate, having done all the heavy water-carrying for the Evil Empire on the ICANN 'reform'. In the process he completely alienated the non-commercial constituency he supposedly represented, but that should only help him with the business and IP interests. In Pisanty's favor, he's one of the few Board members who takes part in open mailing lists with the public. On the other hand, his confrontational manner routinely upsets people. It would be too much to hope that the voters take to heart the advice of ICANN Board member Amadeu Abril i Abril and start the new Board with a clean slate.

    Then there is Philip Sheppard who has also done yeoman work for the ICANN cabal. As DNSO Names Council Chair he almost single-handedly blocked the establishment of working groups open to all, and replaced them with "Task Forces" in which hand-picked chairs and stacked memberships reached pre-ordained results. Having taken office as DNSO Names Council Chairman on the understanding that it was a term-limited post, he arranged to have the rules changed so he could run again when it became clear that otherwise his successor likely would be Cary Karp (of .museum), who could not be relied on to abuse the Names Council process for the benefit of trademark and business interests.

    Last, but not least, there is candidate Michael Palage, the founder-chairman of the Registrars' constituency, who announced on Valentine's Day that he would step down from that job to run for seat 14 on the ICANN Board. Palage represents some of the best and worse of ICANN. On the one hand (and unlike some) he's a nice guy. He listens. He talks to anyone. He keeps his word. He's been for genuine openness and transparency (the registrars do a fair amount of their work online, and their mailing list is readable by the public).

    On the other hand, Palage has worn so many different hats at once that he's a one-man walking conflict of interest. I've often joked to him that he'll be the first guy deposed if someone files an anti-trust action against ICANN. To his credit, he laughed. A little.

    Here's Michael Palage's ICANN biography:

    • An officer of InfoNetworks, one of the first thirty-two ICANN accredited registrars.
    • Chair of ICANN's Working Group B
    • Chair of the ICANN DNSO Registrar Constituency
    • Consultant to various registrars
    • Consultant to Afilias, the registry operator of the .info TLD.
    • WIPO UDRP Panelist
    • Member of the ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency
    • Founding member of the .US Policy Council
    • Participated in proposals for new gTLDs
    So we've got someone with fingers in almost every pie: registrar, gTLD registry, ccTLD registry, IP, UDRP, would-be gTLD registry.

    Don't get me wrong: Michael Palage's conflicts are a sign he's playing the game by the crazy ICANN rules. ICANN is fundamentally corporatist -- conflicts of interest are a design feature. Indeed, Palage's resume suggests ICANN would be lucky to have him. While no Barbara Simons, he's no Alejandro Pisanty or Philip Sheppard, either, which may explain why some leading user activists, such as Kathy Kleiman, endorsed him.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • Neustar
  • Michael Palage
  • Afilias
  • UDRP
  • ICANNWatch.org
  • ICANN
  • Barbara Simons, North America
  • Alejandro Pisanty, Latin America and Caribbean
  • Philip Sheppard, Europe
  • Michael Palage, North America
  • advice
  • announced
  • mailing list
  • anti-trust
  • Working Group B
  • .US Policy Council
  • corporatist
  • endorsed
  • GNSO Election Procedures
  • Michael
  • posted
  • More on Board of Directors
  • Also by michael
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Where Are the GNSO Board Seat 14 Results? | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: seat 14
    by tbyfield (reversethis-{moc.xinap} {ta} {dleifybt}) on Tuesday March 18 2003, @08:33AM (#11339)
    User #44 Info
    The results aren't public yet because someone has filed a challenge.
    hey, there's an electoral method for you: don't publish the results, don't publish the fact that they've been challenged, and don't publish the name of the person who challenged them...

    one assumes that the person who challenged them knew what the results were.

    cheers,
    t
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com