ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    The Big Picture CENTR, ITU, IANA, WS...
    posted by tbyfield on Monday March 03 2003, @12:53PM

    According to a CENTR press release, the organization's 17th general assembly -- which included representative from twenty-six ccTLDs, two gTLD registrars, and the European Commission -- "adopted a recommendation on the operation of the IANA function, to improve the stability of the IANA." A "preliminary version of the adopted paper was sent to the Department of Commerce." Unfortunately, the paper doesn't seem to be online on CENTR's site. However, another CENTR document, its "comment to ITU WS Geneva, 3-4 March 2003 -01," hints -- rather strongly, I suspect -- at some of the contents of the preliminary version.



    The first key paragraph in the WS comment is unequivocal:
    The IANA ccTLD function is essential for the technical stability of the DNS, and must to be carried out by a body which has the complete trust and acknowledgement of all parties concerned. Such a body must not deal with policy, rather only maintaining the official record of the data connected to the management of the ccTLDs.
    Since ICANN (a) deals with policy, (b) doesn't have the complete trust of the ccTLDs and RIRS, and (c) has insistently politicized -- or, more accurately "policized" -- its conduct of the IANA function, the statement suggests that CENTR believes the ITU should be aware of, and perhaps involved in, discussions surrounding the future of IANA.

    The second key paragraph is, in its own way, even stronger (emphasis added):

    In all European countries the ccTLD manager has a local presence. Therefore the relationship between the ccTLD manager and the respective government is a purely local issue. The global nature of the Internet creates only a few (mostly technical) DNS issues that require global coordination. To provide for a forum for this global coordination, ICANN was created. The governments, embodied as the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC), play an integral role within ICANN. CENTR's members encourage the GAC to engage in a closer dialogue with the ccTLDs on ICANN's performance in delivering a well functioning IANA.

    In essence, CENTR seems to have concluded that ICANN, at least in its current malformation, may have outlived its usefulness -- and is willing to use the ITU's WS process as an opportunity to wrest the IANA function away from ICANN.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • Government Advisory Committee
  • IANA
  • ITU
  • ICANN
  • press release
  • comment to ITU WS Geneva, 3-4 March 2003 -01
  • More on The Big Picture
  • Also by tbyfield
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    CENTR, ITU, IANA, WS... | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 4 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    There will always be politics with IANA's DNS role
    by phoffman@proper.com on Monday March 03 2003, @03:15PM (#11265)
    User #2063 Info
    There is absolutely no way that IANA's role as the pointer to ccTLDs in the root can be done without politics. You can't say "this person is that country's representative" without politics.

    You can defer the decision to someone else (probably the UN, possibly the ITU). Even that is a political decision because many countries have internal politics that decide who gets to speak in the UN or the ITU.

    If IANA was run cleanly separate from ICANN, this would not be nearly as much of a problem as it has become. ICANN's staff have made IANA an enforcement arm, and that in turn has made ccTLDs wary of IANA.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com