ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    The Big Picture Telephone Numbers Are Hard Too
    posted by michael on Thursday February 06 2003, @01:57PM

    Today's New York Times brings a useful reminder that even naming schemes better established than the DNS can have a problem deploying new addresses and new services. Seems the RBOCs in the US are unwilling or unable to deploy the new national '555' number service. Indeed, Marcia Biederman's article Personal 555 Number Is Still Mostly Fiction describes problems that may sound a little familiar, although the DNS wars have yet to feature on celluloid.



    Does any of this sound familiar:
    For decades, telecommunications historians say, the Bell System and its successors had reserved numbers with the 555 prefix for special uses. They were thus ideal for television and movies, where their mention would not prompt prank calls to real people.

    That ended in 1994, when a contractor to the Federal Communications Commission, the North American Numbering Plan Administration, began accepting applications for these numbers from the public. They were meant to be dialed nationally or across broad regions of the continent, without regard to area code, on the model of 555-1212, the directory assistance number.

    Attracted by the prospect of catchy nationwide numbers like 555-TRIP for travel reservations or 555-TAXI for cab service, applications poured in from newspapers, airlines and radio stations. Entrepreneurs applied for numbers that spelled famous corporate names, much as speculators reserve Internet domains. An assignment cost nothing, but it was left to the assignee to work out activation and payment arrangements with local phone companies. But today, with all but 2,000 of the 10,000 numbers assigned, no one seems able to name even one that works as hoped. A few have been activated in small cities, but require area codes; more than 100 have been put into service of sorts, with cumbersome dial-around prefixes (like bypassing the local carrier with a number on the order of 10-10-321-212-555-1234). But the dream of summoning food coast to coast with, say, 555-TACO remains elusive.

    Proponents blame major telephone companies, which they assert have thwarted activation of 555 numbers for fear that they might divert revenue from 800 numbers or other products.

    This is only an excerpt -- there's lots more in the article.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • New York Times
  • the article
  • Personal 555 Number Is Still Mostly Fiction
  • More on The Big Picture
  • Also by michael
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    Telephone Numbers Are Hard Too | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Domain Names vs. Numbers
    by joppenheimer on Sunday February 09 2003, @02:54PM (#11129)
    User #5 Info | http://JudithOppenheimer.com
    I'm somewhat familiar with the 555 issue, and it has been an unfair problem for the number holders - unfortunately what they didn't forsee (in the most simplistic terms) was that RBOCs are the most difficult entities for everyone to deal with, on everything. It is one of the variables that makes their very good idea, not so good.

    And unlike 800, there were new users who were interested, but not existing users really willing to go to the mat like with 800 and portability, 888 replication, etc.

    But I want to clarify that names and numbers are not the same at all, in some very profound ways.

    Using 800 (my area of expertise) as an example, while registrant agreements grant the user no control over the domain name, portability grants the 800 subscriber control over the 800 number and service. This is an FCC enforced distinction. (Imagine ICANN doing that!)

    Trademark has preemptive dibs in domain names. Specifically not so in numbers.

    All its flaws acknowledged, there is still a sanity in the PSTN numbering scheme, and to varying degrees an accountability and availability of remedy, that has never existed in domain names.

    (Those who have read my ongoing concerns about ENUM may now understand why. Cure the DNS before you drop numbers behind its iron curtain!)

    Judith
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com