ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) First auDRP decision
    posted by michael on Wednesday February 05 2003, @08:01PM

    Philippe Rodhain writes "On 3 January 2003 the first decision under the .au Dispute Resolution Policy (auDRP) was handed down. The decision relates to a dispute over the domain name adra.com.au.



    "The auDRP

    The .au Dispute Resolution Policy (auDRP) commenced operation on 1 August 2002 and is applicable to all open .au domain names (ie all com.au, net.au, org.au asn.au, and id.au domain names) registered or renewed from 1 August 2002. The auDRP is intended to provide a cheaper and quicker alternative to litigation for resolution of disputes between domain name holders (known as the Registrants) and parties with competing rights in the domain name.

    To succeed in an auDRP action (ie to obtain cancellation or transfer of the disputed domain name) it is necessary for the party (Complainant) bringing the Complaint to show that:
    • The domain name is identical with or confusingly similar to a name, trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights;
    • The domain name holder (known as the Registrant) has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name; and
    • The domain name has been registered or subsequently used in bad faith.
    It is important to emphasise that the onus is on the Complainant to prove each of these three elements.

    The Complainant can file an auDRP Complaint with one of the auDA-approved dispute resolution service providers which include the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) and The Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia (IAMA).

    The auDRP is a local adaptation of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) - an established dispute resolution policy administered by the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) which applies to gTLDs such as .com, .net, .biz, .info and .org.

    The case of adra.com.au [1]

    The Australian Drivers Rights Association (the Complainant) registered adra.com.au in 1998 and had operated a website at www.adra.com.au. In May 2002, the Complainant instructed a registration reseller to renew adra.com.au (which was due to expire in July 2002). However, the registration reseller failed to renew adra.com.au and as a result adra.com.au lapsed and was de-registered. Accordingly, adra.com.au became available for registration and in August 2002 the domain name was registered by Australian Dust Removalists Association (the Respondent).

    In November 2002, the Australian Drivers Rights Association (the Complainant) filed an auDRP Complaint with The Institute of Arbitrators and Mediators Australia (IAMA) on the basis that Australian Dust Removalists Association (the Respondent) registered the disputed domain name mainly in order to prevent the complainant from using its own website or at least to attempt to sell it for valuable consideration in excess of the out of pocket costs of the domain name registration. In response, Australian Dust Removalists Association (the Respondent) argued that the domain name was registered in good faith and that the domain name is an obvious acronym of their association name (which was chosen in 1999). Australian Dust Removalists Association (the Respondent) also stated that they were unaware of the existence of the Australian Drivers Rights Association (the Complainant) prior to the dispute.

    The sole panelist appointed to decide the case found in favour of Australian Dust Removalists Association (the Respondent), deciding that the Respondent did have a legitimate interest in the domain name and that the registration of the domain name was not in bad faith. Accordingly, adra.com.au remains registered to Australian Dust Removalists Association (the Respondent).

    Apart from the substance of the adra.com.au decision, this case highlights the importance of good management of domain name portfolios and the disastrous consequences of inefficient management of them.

    By Philippe Rodhain, Intellectual Property Lawyer, Phillips Ormonde & Fitzpatrick (philippe.rodhain@pof.com.au)

    (For more information on auDRP, see The Launch of the auDRP on this website)

    This article is not intended as a substitute for legal advice. The specific facts that apply to your matter may make the outcome different than would be anticipated by you. You should consult with an attorney specialized in the issue and laws.

    [1] Australian Drivers Rights Association v. Australian Dust Removalists Association, IAMA2351 (.pdf)

    Copyright © 2003 Philippe Rodhain. No portion of this article may be copied, retransmitted, reposted, duplicated or otherwise used without the express written approval of the author, other than the normal incidents of copying and transmission associated with the ordinary use of this website.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • UDRP
  • auDRP
  • ICANN
  • Australian Drivers Rights Association v. Australian Dust Removalists Association, IAMA2351
  • Philippe Rodhain
  • decision
  • More on Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP)
  • Also by michael
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    First auDRP decision | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 1 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    adra.com.au vs. adra.org.au
    by dtobias (dan@tobias.name) on Thursday February 06 2003, @06:35AM (#11096)
    User #2967 Info | http://domains.dan.info/

    I note that adra.org.au [adra.org.au], which would seem to be a more appropriate address than the .com.au one for either of these associations, belongs to the Adventist Development and Relief Agency.

    [ Reply to This | Parent ]


    Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com