ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    Country-Code Top Level Domains (ccTLDs) .la goes home!
    posted by michael on Friday December 27 2002, @11:12AM

    msr986 writes "I Just received the following email from Sterling. It seems the Lao Government has decided to run the .la registry themselves, despite a seven year contract with Sterling!

    [Editor's note: It's alleged below that ICANN (aka IANA) redelegated .la without ever getting a comment from Sterling, described as the incumbent operator. However, this allegation needs to be read in the context of the statement in the redelegation report that despite whatever contracts it may have had with the Laotian government, Sterling was never actually the official incumbent. Whatever the justice and the equities here, and I'm not certain where they are, one thing is clear: we would all be better off it ICANN were to give public notice of redelegation requests for comment from all interested parties, rather then getting comment in private -- inevitably missing some that would be relevant. ICANN's failure to undertake this task of ccTLD administration in an open and transparent manner is simply shameful -- whatever the justice of this case. -mf]"



    Dear .la Registrants,

    On 11 December 2002 ICANN announced its decision to re-delegate the ccTLD .la to the Lao Government, specifically the Lao National Internet Committee (LANIC). DotLA and Sterling were not aware that this change was being contemplated by ICANN or IANA, and we were not contacted by ICANN/IANA for our comments either before or after ICANN made its decision.

    By way of background, Sterling signed a contract with the Lao government in 2000 for exclusive rights to operate and market the .la domain for 7 years, and Sterling's .la registry operations successfully began in December 2000.

    In good faith, Sterling has invested over $3M, nearly $1M of it going directly to the Lao's for the license and a Lao Internet gateway and system, to develop, operate and market the .la registry and domain.

    As you can imagine, we are greatly disappointed with ICANN's and LANIC's unilateral decision. When we became aware of this, we Immediately contacted ICANN and sent our comments to them in writing. As of today, ICANN has yet to respond to our letter, and the .la name servers were changed on December 20th, 2002.We are currently investigating our legal options.

    From the beginning, Sterling has expressed its concern and desire that the current .la registrants be fully protected during this process. ICANN indicated that it believes that .la registrants should not be effected by this change, based on input it received from LANIC. As Sterling no longer has control of the .la registry and LANIC's plans have not been communicated to us, we have no way of knowing if that is the case. If you experience any difficulties with your .la service you should contact LANIC, who has taken responsibility for the .la registry, at www.la or support@register.la. You should also be aware that LANIC has diverted all Sterling .la email addresses to them, so if you wish to communicate with Sterling please do so using the sterling@i-DNS.net.

    We apologise if this change creates any inconvenience to you.

    Sterling Management


     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • redelegation report
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    .la goes home! | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 11 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Banana republic domains
    by dag on Tuesday January 07 2003, @01:08AM (#10905)
    User #3608 Info
    That's to be expected when you register banana republic domains. You're at the mercy of some regime, somewhere.
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com