ICANNWatch
 
  Inside ICANNWatch  
Submit Story
Home
Lost Password
Preferences
Site Messages
Top 10 Lists
Latest Comments
Search by topic

Our Mission
ICANN for Beginners
About Us
How To Use This Site
ICANNWatch FAQ
Slash Tech Info
Link to Us
Write to Us

  Useful ICANN sites  
  • ICANN itself
  • Bret Fausett's ICANN Blog
  • Internet Governance Project
  • UN Working Group on Internet Governance
  • Karl Auerbach web site
  • Müller-Maguhn home
  • UDRPinfo.com;
  • UDRPlaw.net;
  • CircleID;
  • LatinoamerICANN Project
  • ICB Tollfree News

  •   At Large Membership and Civil Society Participation in ICANN  
  • icannatlarge.com;
  • Noncommercial Users Constituency of ICANN
  • NAIS Project
  • ICANN At Large Study Committee Final Report
  • ICANN (non)Members page
  • ICANN Membership Election site

  • ICANN-Related Reading
    Browse ICANNWatch by Subject

    Ted Byfied
    - ICANN: Defending Our Precious Bodily Fluids
    - Ushering in Banality
    - ICANN! No U CANN't!
    - roving_reporter
    - DNS: A Short History and a Short Future

    David Farber
    - Overcoming ICANN (PFIR statement)

    A. Michael Froomkin
    - When We Say US™, We Mean It!
    - ICANN 2.0: Meet The New Boss
    - Habermas@ discourse.net: Toward a Critical Theory of Cyberspace
    - ICANN and Anti-Trust (with Mark Lemley)
    - Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA & the Constitution (html)
    - Form and Substance in Cyberspace
    - ICANN's "Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy"-- Causes and (Partial) Cures

    Milton Mueller
    - Ruling the Root
    - Success by Default: A New Profile of Domain Name Trademark Disputes under ICANN's UDRP
    - Dancing the Quango: ICANN as International Regulatory Regime
    - Goverments and Country Names: ICANN's Transformation into an Intergovernmental Regime
    - Competing DNS Roots: Creative Destruction or Just Plain Destruction?
    - Rough Justice: A Statistical Assessment of the UDRP
    - ICANN and Internet Governance

    David Post
    - Governing Cyberspace, or Where is James Madison When We Need Him?
    - The 'Unsettled Paradox': The Internet, the State, and the Consent of the Governed

    Jonathan Weinberg
    - Sitefinder and Internet Governance
    - ICANN, Internet Stability, and New Top Level Domains
    - Geeks and Greeks
    - ICANN and the Problem of Legitimacy

    Highlights of the ICANNWatch Archive
    (June 1999 - March 2001)


     
    New gTLDs ICANN's Creation of more sponsored TLDs
    posted by tbyfield on Friday December 06 2002, @05:47AM

    Anonymous writes "As we all know, ICANN, in the form of President Stuart Lynn, is calling for the creation of 3 more gTLDs, this time of the sponsored variety only. This is in direct opposition to ICANN's published position [in Reconsideration Request 00-14 -- tbyfield]:"



    Second, it should be clear that no applications were rejected; the object was not to pick winners and losers, but to select a limited number of appropriate proposals for a proof of concept. All of the proposals not selected remain pending, and those submitting them will certainly have the option to have them considered if and when additional TLD selections are made.
    It is my opinion that, should ICANN contemplate additional TLD selections, they must open the process to all first round applicants, of all types of gTLDs, who wish to have their pending application receive further consideration. If, in the opinion of ICANN, there is reason to create more TLDs, the restriction to sponsored only is a regulation of the market for domain name services that has no obvious purpose other than to make it easier for ICANN to exclude new competition. Clearly, ICANN is trying to reduce the political pressure for more TLDs, reduce the pressure from the losers of the .ORG re-bid and the first round, yet keep any real competition for insiders as far away as possible.

     
      ICANNWatch Login  
    Nickname:

    Password:

    [ Don't have an account yet? Please create one. It's not required, but as a registered user you can customize the site, post comments with your name, and accumulate reputation points ("karma") that will make your comments more visible. ]

     
      Related Links  
  • Reconsideration Request 00-14
  •  
    This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
    ICANN's Creation of more sponsored TLDs | Log in/Create an Account | Top | 27 comments | Search Discussion
    Click this button to post a comment to this story
    The options below will change how the comments display
    Threshold:
    Check box to change your default comment view
    The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
    Re: ICANN's Creation of more sponsored TLDs
    by PeterBarron (pebarron@hotmail.com) on Friday December 06 2002, @07:04AM (#10434)
    User #3240 Info | http://www.icannwatch.org/
    I'll repeat what I said on another topic, and then it's time for a long weekend in the countryside:

    There is nothing wrong with the new TLDs. They are succeeding or failing on their own merits.

    What is wrong is that there aren't more. What is wrong, more specifically, is that there are companies who wish to be registries who are not being allowed to do so for no good reason.

    As long as there is a single, qualified applicant being told that they will not be considered, ICANN is restricting access to a market for no good reason. In any other industry, this would be a violation of antitrust laws.

    Why not here?

    ++Peter
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
    Re: Please, No More TLDs...
    by IcannWatcher on Friday December 06 2002, @09:28PM (#10452)
    User #3568 Info
    There're probably going to be new tlds but they most probably are not going to be unrestricted gTlds; the time for this baby has run out. They're already talking about taxonomic models for DNS. Also, a new gTLD like .WEB would just be a repeat of .NET, which is not that successful even though run by the same registry as .com. So an argument that a better run registry would somehow make such a tld successful does not make sense. And, if this .WEB thing ever get its way into the official ICANN root system, one of the conditions will/should be that ALL the names be available to anyone who qualifies; the public/businesses will/should not be deprived of the prime names registered by .WEB speculators before the fact (it becoming an official tld). How would that be for fairness and open market competition?
    [ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.

  • Search ICANNWatch.org:


    Privacy Policy: We will not knowingly give out your personal data -- other than identifying your postings in the way you direct by setting your configuration options -- without a court order. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 by ICANNWatch.Org. This web site was made with Slashcode, a web portal system written in perl. Slashcode is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL license.
    You can syndicate our headlines in .rdf, .rss, or .xml. Domain registration services donated by DomainRegistry.com